22

The title says it all. If qubits can be in the position of a 1 and 0, why can't multiple computers using 1s and 0s accomplish the same thing?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can definitely simulate quantum computer with classical computer, but it just won't be as efficient. classical computers would require exponential more space to simulated the process of a quantum computer, which quickly becomes unscalable.

[-] MagosInformaticus@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd say the key insight with quantum computing is that its algorithms are about choreographing interference patterns among qubits such that wrong answers cancel each other out but right answers reinforce one another. It's not just a matter of trying possibilities in parallel or "running different probabilities simultaneously" - the qubits' states are complex combinations of 0 and 1 states, and they interact with and change one another. Simulating those interactions on a classical computer requires exponentially growing amounts of memory space and time as the quantum computation gets bigger. Trying to divide-and-conquer this simulation over multiple classical computers runs into the need for different parts of the circuit to know about each others' state, limiting how much work can be sectioned off to be done by each computer in the group.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Not just a one and a zero simultaneously, but every decimal in between. All infinity of them. This is the part that doesn't scale well, classical computers don't like infinity. Quantum computers love it.

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Actually, it's explicitly not all in between. The quantum state is a super position, not a smear. It is (ideally) both 1 and 0, but nothing in between.

It's power comes when you have a multi bit number. 16 bits give 65536 possibilities. A classical computer would have to check each one individually to process them all. A quantum computer does them all in 1 go.

While it gets very messy in the implementation, quantum computers are still binary, just quantum binary. No infinities needed

[-] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

i believe what you're thinking is analog computers

[-] Capricorny90210@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the insights, guys. My brain is a bit more wrinkly now.

[-] JavaTea@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

It won't be the same as a quantum computer but something like this has been done before (albeit illegally):

Carna botnet - Podcast and info

[-] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

i don't know, but aren't supercomputers already doing that with many cores except that kinda has a limit?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
22 points (89.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35250 readers
952 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS