Why does the compiler complain about a missing constructor when I'm just resizing my std::vector to a smaller size? (devblogs.microsoft.com)

submitted 1 year ago by gracicot@programming.dev to c/cpp@programming.dev

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Arkaniol@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you. But why not just init the vector std::vector vect(56) And then resize 🧐

permalink
fedilink
source
hideshow 2 child comments

[-] KRAW@linux.community 1 points 1 year ago

That vector constructor still requires a default constructor for the class of the object contained by the vector, so it's the same issue but different context.

permalink
fedilink
source

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023

8 points (100.0% liked)

C++

1732 readers

1 users here now

The center for all discussion and news regarding C++.

Rules

Respect instance rules.
Don't be a jerk.
Please keep all posts related to C++.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Nihili0@programming.dev

lysdexic@programming.dev