this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

5192 readers
79 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A total of 12 fossil fuel and anti-renewables groups spent $1.2 million on Meta ads specifically mentioning energy.

In response just six renewable energy companies and one lobby group put ads on Meta platforms, but they spent just 1 per cent of the amount that the 12 kicked in over the same period.

There's tables in the article showing who is spending what on Facebook ads before the Vic and NSW state elections - Australian Energy Producers, Shell, and Minerals Council of Australia (including their astroturfing subsidiary Hands Off Our Fuel) are the biggest spenders.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stigger32@aussie.zone 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

And yet it will all come to nothing.

Renewables have already turned a corner within the population. And the high fuel prices have just sped its general acceptance up.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Its about wringing every last cent out of those stranded assets. They could take a loss and shift their imoney elsewhere but it would be brutal if potential buyers look at the regulatory environment and go nope. They know they are going to lose it all eventually but it's about the next quarters results and the quarter after.

So this is what they have to do. Cost of business. Subvert democracy. Get people to vote for fascists, pedos, crazies, crooks. Anyone who wouldn't have a chance in a sensible world if it wasn't for the fossil fuel money beaming crazy bullshit into people's heads 24x7. Crooked politicians, influencers and media are all lined up for their payout.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's pretty telling that the only way the anti-renewable arguments get any traction now is when attached to the "woke ideology" strawman. They have completely lost the scientific and economic arguments.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

works though, look at the LNP in Qld. Shit canned the electric tram extension on the Gold Coast, to be replaced with buses, shit canned the move to electric buses and just ordered 630 diesel buses, during a diesel crisis ;)

They spent the first 12 months in Government running around like headless chickens, responding to climate change amplified weather catastrophes.

This is the best Qld has...

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

They don't have a choice do they? They want more money. They make more money if they subvert democracy with a bunch of bullshit deflections and divisiveness. The sooner we remove our dependency on fossil fuels, the sooner we get back to normal politics. But the faster we move the more they are going to spend resisting.

Weirdly the thing that will finish it all is going to be the free market. The world is increasingly moving to cheaper, better products regardless of environmental legislation or fossil fuel lobbying. When the technology and manufacturing is there this stuff flips. The law of the jungle can be cruel.

[–] arbilp3@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I really hope so, because although people have taken to rooftop solar with gusto, there's still quite a lot of pushback against large-scale renewables in some regional areas.

[–] Stigger32@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

‘In some regional areas.’ - Yep. And it won’t change a thing. There’s no political power in those regions anymore. It’s all consolidated in and around the main population hubs.

That said. It would be good governance to subsidise farmers to switch to renewables. As they do most of the heavy lifting when it comes to keeping us fed and watered…👍

[–] arbilp3@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Totally agree. Mind you, those that host renewables on their land get paid quite well.

[–] shads@leminal.space 2 points 2 days ago

I sometimes look at the ideological splits in regional areas and wonder if these people are being led to irrational hatred of renewables to make sure that the early movers reap the most benefit. Surely that last stick in the mud core group of farmers are going to see far less yield off their solar projects than the ones who have siezed the initiative. I wonder how many anti-solar pollies have family that have already pounced and don't want to see their profits take a hit once every man and his dog is feeding power into the grid.