this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
32 points (100.0% liked)

AI

6603 readers
10 users here now

Artificial intelligence (AI) is intelligence demonstrated by machines, unlike the natural intelligence displayed by humans and animals, which involves consciousness and emotionality. The distinction between the former and the latter categories is often revealed by the acronym chosen.

founded 5 years ago
 

https://www.anthropic.com/threat-intelligence-report-september-2026

We identified a cell of threat actors based in northern Yemen running three weapons development programs: a guided rocket that used a commodity phone-class flight computer with final-phase homing guidance; a multi-stage ballistic missile with a stated range goal above 2,000 km; and a multi-variant missile (referred to as the “R2000” set) that included a hypersonic glide vehicle variant.

The actors used Claude Code in place of human software engineers to develop the guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) software that steers and stabilizes a flying vehicle. For example, they used Claude to integrate an open-source autopilot onto a phone-class flight computer, writing the control and position estimation software, tuning the control settings, running a firmware build pipeline, and performing a flight simulation. The actors managed several Claude instances at once, assigning each one a role, much as a lead would delegate work on a small engineering team: the actors tasked one instance with writing the code, another with research, and a third with reviewing the code the first instance produced.

Our safeguards blocked many of their requests, but not all of them. The actors used a variety of tactics to evade our safeguards, including hiding their goals and the products the software was meant for, and they split their work across multiple sessions so no single session revealed their full intent.

These actors carried out a sustained effort to develop guided weapons, including using Claude to design guidance software. We do not have evidence the actors succeeded in fielding an operational device; but they did test-fire a guided rocket. This field test appears to have failed: within hours, the actors returned to Claude to work out why it failed.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] elekitty@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

they're selling the same shit to the DOD to do the same thing, no?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 3 weeks ago

It’s moral when I sell this technology to war criminals.

It’s immoral when other people do it.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

it's like how ford, gm, ge, etc. sold to both the americans and the nazis during world war 2.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Likely way ahead of you

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

LLMs make many things more accessible to everyone. Now you can write poetry and books… or develop guided missiles. Either way, it’s all accessible now.

I think this is going to change the world just like the Internet and electricity once did. It enables people to do all sorts of new things. What used to be hard, is suddenly within reach to a larger audience.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And EVERYTHING gets logged. What could possibly go wrong

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Whoever reads my fantasy literature will cringe so hard that they will have an aneurysm.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"So there's this guy, and he like, reincarnates, but then he has superpowers and is now the strongest person alive. But here's the plot twist: nobody realizes it!"

Genuinely, replace 75% of writers with AI and the world will be a better place.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

LLMs were trained with that dataset, which means that 75% of it is awful. Then the model just gravitates towards the average of the data, which is not the worsts garbage there is, but it’s definitely pretty far from the 25% that was actually readable.

[–] ataraxya@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago
[–] bonesawmcl@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I wonder if the AI bros got access to ITAR restricted code based and trained on them? Couldn't that mean they are in violation of those rules?

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] bonesawmcl@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Good to know! Thanks!