Windscribe spending their social media time pointing out the flaws of others feels the same to me as political slander ads, TBH. Perhaps they could spend their time on grok.com telling everyone why windscribe is so great.
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
19 points (85.2% liked)
Technology
116 readers
49 users here now
Blacklisted Sites
List inspired by other community rules.
- Mac Rumors;
- Al Jazeera;
- NBC;
- CNBC;
- Tom’s Hardware;
- ZDNet;
- TechSpot;
- Ars Technica;
- Engadget;
- TechCrunch;
- Gizmodo;
- Futurism;
- PCWorld;
- ComputerWorld;
- Mashable;
- Fortune;
- Hackaday;
- WCCFTECH;
- Neowin;
- Jacobin;
- Yahoo;
- Freethink;
- Big Think;
- Newsweek.
Technology news, blogs and articles.
Forbidden:
- Paywalled content.
- Older than 1 month articles;
- External video links(non native videos);
- Article talking about article, research or news.(Always use original articles).
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
Don't competing companies do this all the time in a free market? If it's not true, or if Windscribe is just as guilty, that's one thing. But calling out misleading stuff being used even indirectly to take customers from you isn't slander.
I was simply stating the taste the tweet left in my mouth. How this particular for-profit company handled their social media in a free market would make me look elsewhere.



