this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
162 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

87001 readers
2466 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] garretble@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I wish DDG defaulted to their no ai search.

If they want to make silly little jokes about “the other guys and their ai” then maybe don’t use ai shit as your default search option on your own platform?

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I have only read the title but this just seems like.. Normal glasses then?

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yep. Just normal, AliBaba sunglasses.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Probably more expensive than AliBaba. Which might or might not mean better quality.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think it was like $25

Edit: $35

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Sooooo not anti-pervert and a generic publicity stunt. Haha please laugh etc. Don't have anything against DDG but can only roll my eyes at something like this

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 25 points 4 days ago

I mean, I'm not gonna buy them, but I still enjoy the dad joke.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

Sometimes corny is fun

[–] credo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Right. Anti-pervert glasses would at least require some lasers to meet the requisite qualifications.

[–] T3CHT@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Fair - it's marketing.
But it's good marketing - lambasts a stupid thing that people dislike to promote a product that is selling the opposite (privacy).
Good goal, and the marketing is clearly working here we are talking about it.

Also DDG browser is awesome on mobile and Windows. Blocks many ads and trackers, even on YT. Lightweight, wicked fast, offers not only private search but private AI chat.

Use DDG Because Gemini is SUPER creepy when it inserts personal info in unrelated questions. It keeps inserting my family details in answering unrelated questions now... Like a perv.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

You can hide your eyes with the anti light version of the anti pervert glasses!

[–] twisted@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So it’s not anti-pervert then. It’s just non-pervert.

Anti-pervert would be something like sunglasses that zap the pervert sunglasses' cameras with lasers and damage the sensor. Maybe they don’t have to be so accurate.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are infrared reflecting glasses that blind cameras.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does this work for flock cameras?

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

Not sure. I assume they have a better IR filter than the small cameras used for the pervert glasses.

Although they may be IR sensitive because they also need to work at night though. Would need to see the technical specs.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Maybe a sort of anti pervert mesh network where gamma radiation is fired in the direction of whoever wears pervert glasses and eventually kills them with cancer.

It’s incredibly irresponsible and would have unintended consequences for otherwise innocent people but it would technically work so capitalism says ship it before China does!

[–] Carl@anarchist.nexus 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The real move would be to include polarized lenses or a holographic coating to block infrared facial ID cameras like Flock. Because most sunglasses don’t block the infrared spectrum, meaning something like a Flock camera can see right through them.

These are basically just a dad joke, based on the fact that meta has made every other pair of sunglasses “non-pervert sunglasses” by default.

[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, well said. I wish someone would sell and manufacture actual anti surveillance glasses

[–] gsdsam@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

Are these what you are looking for?

https://www.reflectacles.com/

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago

“No camera, no microphone, no AI, no battery, no electronics of any kind,” Knockaround boasts on its website. “Just a beautifully crafted pair of matte black sunglasses with a glossy DuckDuckGo logo, designed to block the sun and never send data to the cloud

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

...but does it have electrolytes?

[–] justabaldguy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Brawdo's got what plants crave.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Is this now not not not the onion?

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

$39 is probably still a huge markup.

[–] DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

They're barely making back the research costs of producing sunglasses without a lithium-polymer battery or a 12 megapixel CMOS camera.

THE ABOVE COMMENT IS SARCASM.
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

there's no extra markup involved here for what is essentially a marketing thing.

they're $35. which is also the price the 'normal' (not 'collab' edition) ones sell for direct on ka's web site or at retailers like rei.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, I recently got new prescription glasses (after wearing my previous pairs for way too long, BTW) and got some that have an IR-blocking coating that's supposed to block face recognition cameras. Because that apparently needs to be a thing these days.

[–] sunnie@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What, no company names to help out a fella?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I didn't want to give the appearance of shilling. But if you want to know, it's https://www.zennioptical.com/id-guard

There are apparently also similar products from "Reflectacles" and "Vaydr," but they were more expensive and/or not normal prescription glasses. The Zenni thing is just an extra coating you can add on to the glasses you would have otherwise bought anyway (which is how I found out about it; I didn't know it existed beforehand).

[–] sunnie@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks! It’s wild that this is a thing now. It’s like we’re living in a cyberpunk dystopia!

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Unperverted Glasses

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 days ago

This is so stupid. Ddg thinks their users are dumb as fuck. I’m sure they’re right.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

Glasses without electronics? Then how will I see!?!

[–] gl38@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is DuckDuckGo going down the DBrand/Wendy's model of irreverent, self aware marketing? I'm pretty tired of it being honest. Also, are they actually trying to make money from this? A satirical social media post would get the point across. But they're actually selling these for some reason.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Some company just placed DDG logo on existing model of glasses and is selling them for exact same price as a joke. It's not like DDG started manufacturing glasses specifically for this joke.

[–] gl38@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You make it sound like DDG aren't involved at all. They very much are.

It’s not like DDG started manufacturing glasses specifically for this joke.

No, it's likeDDG started selling glasses specifically for this joke.

[–] shishka_b0b@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

The reason is probably to garner as much brand awareness as possible bc the goal of marketing isn't to just get a point across. If a company like DDG can gain a good amount of brand awareness by advertising and selling some relatively inexpensive sunglasses with the company logo on it then I personally see it as a net positive.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Ironically actual meta

[–] ncc74656@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›