this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
23 points (96.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6823 readers
88 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Guys, we really need to save on welfare costs. That's why we made a controversial cut of £5b to disability support.

Meanwhile, we think the army needs more money. £3b last year, and £8.4b here. It's really worth it, I promise.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

just what we need to lower the cost of living

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's Trident.

Andy Burnham is expected to unveil on Thursday an £8.4bn investment for the UK's next generation of nuclear submarines.

Aimed at preparing Dreadnought-class boats for service by the 2030s, the nuclear-armed vessels are set to replace the current Vanguard-class and will be equipped to launch Trident 2 D5 ballistic missiles

This is on top of £16B since the 2020 defence spending report, and £30-40B before that (Wikipedia is a bit fuzzy on some of it). This is sunk-cost spending (no pun intended). There's no other option except cancel the program.

...and none of it covers the missiles, which isn't an independent system.

We need to have much better government procurement oversight. Contract values need to be understood properly upfront. Bids are intentionally low, with companies knowing that once they're "in" costs can go up and they'll get paid. It's a well understood strategy, but it continually happens.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I really hate the whole "it's gone over budget" thing. If the budget doesn't mean anything then why even have it?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

At least this is money primarily going to UK workers.

Trident pisses me off because it buys missile we're perfectly capable of designing and making ourselves. Relying on another nation for last resort national defence is bonkers if you have the choice.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Question is, who is this a deterrent against? Only other nuclear powers.

Russia? We can just blow the shit out of them with conventional weapons, don't need this.

China? We'd fucking lose, a hundred-fold. Only deterrent against China is a very strong Europe, so let's get back to the table.

USA? These submarines carry their missiles, and they'll just remote-disable the fucking things.

France? They've got more nukes than we do, and honestly I can't see us ever being at war with them again.

Israel? Can't see any global power actually taking them to task for their genocide.

Conclusion: useless. On the basis that they're a stupidly expensive left-over from the cold war, might as well cancel it, invest half of the money into conventional boom, and pocket the rest.

[–] crimson_iris@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Russia? We can just blow the shit out of them with conventional weapons, don’t need this.

And what's stopping them from escalating with nuclear weapons, if not a strategic nuclear deterrent? Also, you may be severely overestimating the conventional forces of the UK.

[–] Lenins_Dumbbell@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Ngl, Nukes off the table and no external support, Russia would steamroll the UK. Its not even funny how badly.

Forget ever competing against China. All of Europe combined is still irrelevant once you factor in China's industrial base.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

Isn't that 2020 thinking?

Ukraine has show how they are vulnerable.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 0 points 2 days ago

This is the Navy, not the army, and it’s in a very sorry state. At least half the fleet is laid up for maintenance, and what’s left isn’t exactly brilliant. The 2010 strategic review gutted military capability and now, as things are hotting up, there are Russian ships conducting live fire exercises in the channel.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Iran has the right to have nukes