An untested backup is no backup at all. At least test once or twice per year.
DevOps
DevOps integrates and automates the work of software development (Dev) and IT operations (Ops) as a means for improving and shortening the systems development life cycle.
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to DevOps
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
- Try to keep discussions on topic
- No spam of tools/companies/advertisements
- It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be promotional content.
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
Built my first environment a couple of hours ago for a mission critical project. In this case, and a bit of overkill, we have hourly backups, and the process then spins up a VM, sets up pgsql, uploads the fresh backup, reports it as ok and then stores it, if it fails, requests a fresh backup, or calls the admin to report a problem.
We have customers who do monthly restore tests. I haven't restored my home env in a while.
I noticed I could not restore pg dumps as expected when migrating to a new server. I had to add some parameter to pg dump so it's a better/more neutral dump or something, which was easier/able to restore. So - definitely check your backups.
Trying the restore locally is also an option. Just to verify it works and the expected data is there.
How important it is to verify and verify regularly depends on how much loss you're willing to accept.
Once verified, as long as you don't do big version upgrades or automation changes, I would expect it to continue to work indefinitely. A semi regular verification still makes sense, though.
At work I know my DB backups definitely work for other reasons, due to regular restores in non-prod.
For side projects I definitely recommend verifying it at least once, when setting up automated backups/scripts for backup creation.