this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
24 points (87.5% liked)

Geopolitics : News and discussion

429 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

I'm guessing this is a result of 3 factors:

  • Hormuz closure.

  • Russian refineries getting blown up by Ukraine. (And then Russia using up what fuel it does still have in an attempt to alleviate shortages and keep the front lines supplied.)

  • The US emptying out their strategic reserves in a desperate attempt to prevent gas prices from going even higher due to the former two.

Edit:

The scale of this graph is a bit deceptive, though. While a casual glance makes it look like it's going almost down to zero, the vertical scale starts at 1,050,000. While the chart makes it look like it's already gone down to almost nothing, it's only gone down from ~1,275,000 to ~1,175,000. Obviously, it's still significantly low when compared to previous years, but it has 'only' gone down by about 8% since the beginning of the year.

[–] gaiussabinus@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

For a product with inelastic demand, that is very close to zero if you define zero as disruptions.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a pretty big amount at the bottom of the SPR that's unusable sludge.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Would you not rotate stock? I don't know why any supply would be first-in-last-out. We shouldn't be describing a reserve that is one container the size of a lake.

[–] Athena5898@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

I mean no one ever thought that putting it in a place where the integrity gets worse the less you have, so I'd imagine not a lot of thought is happening.

Also Saudi Arabia / OPEC selling low to undercut other sources to establish dominance on the market.

[–] dRLY@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

I wasn't aware of it before I saw articles talking about how we are using so much of the SPR currently. But apparently using so much of it actually can cause the caves/caverns to warp and start various chunks of the walls to fall. So even if it isn't factually about to run out, it is a big issue to be creating the "emergency" requiring pulling from it.

I guess it is a big win for the private companies that get the sellers market in government needing to fill it back up (and of course basically double-dip in profits from higher prices for normal use).

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The truncated Y-axis makes it look worse than it is

[–] formlessoedon@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

Now compare the SPR & diesel stock levels to the 1970 oil shock! I will explain this tomorrow or some shit. Probably

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, better get fracking... 🙄

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

or forcing poor countries to

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What kind of monster picks dark blue, dark red, dark green, light green, light grey, and also the same fucking light grey again as the colours for their line graph fucks sake

[–] formlessoedon@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

[needlessly crabby reply redacted]

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

1050000 is not 0 though

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

If it continues like this, mid-2027 they're dead

[–] marretics@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Usually I would say that's a good thing as I would read that to mean that you guys are less dependent on oil now, so you need to keep less storage of it.

Looking at what's going on in the world I don't think this is the result of any good development and could severely fuck up your economy.

Good luck!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Even demand destruction is a win if you're radical enough (as an environmentalist or urbanist).