this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

749 readers
1 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by Piefed.social terms and conditions
  2. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  3. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:
!forgottenweapons@lemmy.world

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago
[–] lime@feddit.nu 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i thought these things were superior in dogfighting, where you don't need a radar anyway. in fact, remove the hardpoints and internal bays too, then it'll be even better at stealth and dogfighting.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's the F-22. The F-35 isn't that great at dogfighting. But that's not really relevant these days anyway.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

seems like an oversight, in that case they'd need radars

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

that requires a monthly subscription

[–] Chronal@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

So are they operating these things with radar delivered over datalink by another aircraft? Like a guide dog?