What an absolutely terrible way to deal with the problem.
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)
worldnews
3685 readers
33 users here now
Welcome!
We strive for high-quality standards on the latest world events.
The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.
Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!
Rules:
Rule 1: No Further Gaza/Israel war posts
Rule 2: No US internal news/US politics
Rule 3: Editorials, opinions, analysis, blogs, gifs, memes, etc non-serious news sources
Rule 4: Non-English articles require a translation in the post or comments (mark the title with the source language eg. [FR] for French)
Rule 5: Petitions, advocacy, surveys
Rule 6: All-caps titles
Rule 7: Old news (≥ 1-Month-old) articles
Rule 8: Unlabeled NSFW images/videos
Rule 9: URL shorteners
- The general rules of the sh.itjust.works instance apply!
Thank you.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Why is that?
When you create the ability to brick phones you create the ability to mass-brick phones. Imagine a totalitarian regime seeing an uprising on the horizon and bricking the phones of protesters that attended some protest. Imagine hackers or three -letter agencies getting this ability wanting to disrupt the economy of a town, city, or country. I wouldn't be opposed to someone having software on their phone to remote brick it. I'd be surprised if something like that didn't already exist. It's government mandating a backdoor that's the problem.
Because the authorities could then brick anyone's phone at any time. Including rich people and corporations that could hire security consultants to manage hackers to do it.
Because it’s the police’s responsibility to stop the snatchers in the first place? Not insist that other companies make up for their lack of results.
It’s not a COMPLETELY terrible idea, I know Apple already bricks stolen phones upon request, but at the owner’s expense. It’s still the people hired to solve the problem passing the responsibility on to others.
They will still steal them, just part them out.
That's already the goal of factory reset protection...
Though there's ways to bypass FRP. And ultimately always will be.
And how should this switch be operated, and by who?
It's hard to imagine a kill switch for a communications device meant to be used for rendering a stolen device inaccessible or useless being misused by anyone with power anywhere in the world. At all.
Ever.