this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
6 points (80.0% liked)

AskHistorians

1365 readers
68 users here now

QUESTIONS

  1. Be civil.
  2. Be specific.
  3. Historical topic must be from at least 20 years ago.
  4. Post questions in the title. Elaboration is for the text box.

RESPONSES

  1. Be civil.
  2. Provide comprehensive answers.
  3. Please provide primary and secondary sources upon good faith request. Tertiary sources, like Wikipedia, are not accepted.

askhistorians is a community for academic answers to questions about history. Polls, opinions, bigotry, grammar pedantry, and personal insults will be removed.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] PugJesus@piefed.social 8 points 5 days ago

Two children would have maintained (or nearly maintained) the population, whereas the issue was that Mao encouraging Chinese population growth in the hopes of emerging the dominant power after a nuclear exchange (no, really) had stretched China's resources to the breaking point. After Mao's tenure, birth rates were decreasing, but the Chinese government decided it still wasn't declining fast enough - thus, the one-child policy.

The issue is that one child PLUS increasing lifespans meant a larger retired population with a smaller working population to support them. So now China is attempting to get people to have more kids, again.

It was implemented largely through the government badgering women pregnant with a second child (or more) to get abortions, and by rescinding social service support from families which had more than one child, and making that threat very known.

Starvation.