this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
-6 points (31.2% liked)

Hardware

7542 readers
400 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Following up from my HD 3870 video — this time I picked up an untested HD 3850 from 2007 for $9.90. Cleaned it, repasted it and threw it at 6 games on a Core 2 Duo rig. • GTA San Andreas • CoD4 Modern Warfare • Tomb Raider Underworld • Just Cause 2 • NFS Most Wanted • Crysis Temps hit 106°C but it survived.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Look,

I know everybody online says to make thumbnails like these, but at least here on Lemmy, thumbnails like these are a great way to push away a potential audience.

[–] RiskRig91@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fair point, I appreciate the honest feedback. Still figuring out what works best. What kind of thumbnail would you prefer for this type of content?

[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

In my personal opinion, I would be more inclined to click on the video if the thumbnail at least looked like a still image from the video. But to be honest, I probably still wouldn't click on the video for a few reasons:

  • It doesn't sound like there are any surprises and sounds like a generic premise, which in part is because you gave away what I'm assuming to be the ending in the thumbnail. Even if that's untrue and there's more to it, I would still scroll past it based on the assumptions I've made from your title and thumbnail alone.
  • Even if you made the title, "Will this 20 year GPU still work?", I still wouldn't click it, because nerds like me (and are your target audience for this video) know the answer: yes, they typically do.

I'm also going to guess you've been using LLMs for advice on your videos, to which I say: don't bother, regardless of your feelings on them, because they offer advice for a very generic audience, and you're making videos that grandma is never going to click on, even if the algorithm shows it to her.

My most successful thumbnails either came straight from the video (but truthfully, that was mostly luck), or I spent a decent amount of time making something that I thought looked cool. That also has led to some "failures", though.

Good luck!

[–] RiskRig91@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a fair point about the premise — but as a nerd myself, I'd still click out of curiosity. Not just 'does it work' but HOW does it work at 106°C? And what FPS does a Core 2 Duo at 3.8GHz actually push in 2026? That combo is what got me curious enough to test it. Also, thanks for taking the time to give detailed feedback — genuinely helpful for improving future videos

[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No problem.

But you’re giving your video’s packaging far too much credit. People don’t sit and think that deeply about every thumbnail/title they see. Even nerds have gut reactions because there is so much content available, and my gut reaction to this would’ve been at worst, “AI slop” and at best, “boring”.

[–] Mr_Wobble@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That AI thumbnail is gross as fuck.

[–] RiskRig91@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

Haha fair enough, it's AI generated. The real card looked way less dramatic but way more dusty