Good result for them considering their rough performance in the Olympics
this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
17 points (90.5% liked)
Hockey
3421 readers
17 users here now
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
List of Team-Specific Communities:
Metropolitan Division
- Carolina Hurricanes
- Washington Capitals
- Columbus Blue Jackets
- New Jersey Devils
- New York Islanders
- New York Rangers
- Pittsburgh Penguins
- Philadelphia Flyers
Atlantic Division
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Montreal Canadiens
- Boston Bruins
- Ottawa Senators
- Tampa Bay Lightning
- Buffalo Sabres
- Detroit Red Wings
- Florida Panthers
Central Division
- Chicago Blackhawks
- Winnipeg Jets
- Nashville Predators
- Arizona Coyotes
- Dallas Stars
- St Louis Blues
- Minnesota Wild
- Colorado Avalanche
Pacific Division
- Los Angeles Kings
- Edmonton Oilers
- Calgary Flames
- Anaheim Ducks
- Vancouver Canucks
- San Jose Sharks
- Vegas Golden Knights
- Seattle Kraken
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I wouldn't call bronze medal behind the two largest hockey nations in the world while missing Finlands best player rough? Also, they really challenged Canada in their match.
Oh yeah, olympic bronze is still incredible. I saw some of their earlier games though and they were rough
Hmm, do you mean the Slovakia game? Yeah that wasn't great. But the win against Sweden and Italy were solid.
Agree but then it's hard to lose against italy...
Oh yeah, Finland has never lost to one of the not large hockey countries at the Olympics ever so. And the 11-0 win over Italy was convincing. (Not sure if Slovakia is counted to those or if that was the first)
Anywho, it's unclear for me still where the take about the rough Olympics came from. One bad game and otherwise quite successful.
Yep I'm judging them on the games i saw mate.
Water is wet, sky is blue, people who live on ice win at ice sport