this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6696 readers
298 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Barrington@feddit.org 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Worth remembering British Steel was sold under Boris’s Conservative government. People knew ageing blast furnace production was unsustainable without major investment in electric arc furnace technology, yet it was left to decline until the government eventually had to step in to save 3000 jobs.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago

It’s not that blast furnaces were unsustainable, it was that no-one wanted to order their steel. Unlike arc furnaces, blast furnaces are destroyed by the act of turning them off. As the government wanted a UK source of steel for military strategic reasons (but not the steel itself while cheaper imports were available) they were paying to keep the furnaces idling at a cost of £400k per day.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

So we've just bought a failing company? That doesn't sound good.

So I get that steel making might be a strategic national capability that we need to maintain, but is the government going to put the necessary investment into it? They seem incapable of investing in anything.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This should be an argument for a minimum basic income, as these thousands of people are effectively being paid by the state to sit at home because British Steel has no orders on the books.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

How about instead we force taxpayers to pay the shareholders of a failing company upwards of a hundred thousand pounds per worker whose job is being saved?