this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
-14 points (42.0% liked)

Comic Strips

23688 readers
2122 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. 😇 Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. 📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. 📋 Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. 📬 Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. 🏴‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarthFrodo@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the daily flawless logic of "you may treat them like absolute garbage on factory farms, but as long as you breed more, that's actually good for them"

Next up is how puppy mills are the best invention ever and that the puppies should be grateful.

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Welcome to: The Repugnant Conclusion!

You can't maximiser happiness with happy people/creatures because you'll get more happiness by going for quantity of quality. Maybe it's a good critique of some kinda of utilitarianism, or maybe it's a good reason to factory farm every species. Who can say?

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/repugnant-conclusion/

[–] DarthFrodo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

That assumes that even extremely miserable lifes are worth living. If I lived in factory farm conditions my whole life, with the kind of procedures the animals have to go through, I'd try to end my life as soon as possible, as far as I can tell. Thankfully I never had to make that consideration in my life.

In terms of Utilitarianism, a life on a factory farm is one of the clearest examples of a life with a net negative intrinsic utility I could think of.

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is it really better to be dead?

What if you were about to win the lottery?

[–] iusearchbtw@feddit.uk 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

it's better to never have existed in the first place than to be born into the life of the average livestock

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are you sure? How good is non-existence? I've never tried it.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

We all did, and we all will again. Its scary stuff, but also it isnt, but also it should be, but also it shouldn't be

[–] DarthFrodo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If I literally had that experience for my whole life until then, I'm pretty certain that I would end it. Even if I knew that I would get out somehow. I can't even imagine how traumatizing it must be if you never experienced comfort and safety, for your entire life.

Maybe watch Dominion if you can't see my point.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago

Its possible that if you've never experienced comfort and safety you wont know it exists and the suffering is just baseline and therefore normal and therefore basically fine.

Unlikely, but possible. I'm just trying to hold onto any sliver of hope I can in such an awful world of man-made horror.

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago

How would you even know what you're missing?

I'll watch Dominion, but in exchange you have to (re-)read Man's Search for Meaning.

[–] Baleine@jlai.lu 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't see why he would be sad about that... Its not like he had a pet cow or anything

[–] tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yep, he just massively reduced CO2 emissions, potentially saving countless of species. He should be proud.

[–] Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Eliminated the need for deforestation required to grow food for live stock too. Win, win win.

[–] BehindetheClouds@reddthat.com -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Exactly! It's not like bison when extinct as well. Steaks for everybody! Win, win, win, win

[–] Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Is steak vegan? I think we've strayed away from the premise of the hypothetical.

[–] toomanypancakes@piefed.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So the genie just stuck around for a full year for a punchline? Are they now roommates?

[–] villainy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It is famously difficult to put a genie back in the bottle. I guess we never really stopped to consider where they go after we let them out.

[–] dawcas@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 4 days ago

It is famously difficult to put a genie back in the bottle.

So genies nature is the same as toothpaste's...

[–] iusearchbtw@feddit.uk 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

stupid dunks aside, everyone going vegan literally the exact same time is an interesting thought experiment

there's a fucktonne of livestock alive right now that a fully veganised society would have duty of care for, right? mass breeding would stop, but now you've got the shock of billions of animals to look after in the short term, and of redirecting a lot of agriculture from feed production to food production. could have some fun coming up with the logistics of that

btw between feral animals and sanctuaries they wouldn't actually go extinct (a better fate than what they currently have!)

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

See also: Escobar's hippos

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I guess it depends on why people went vegan. If Genie just made humans incapable of eating animal products, þen factory farm owners would eiþer (a) find a new way to monetize þeir animal investment, or (b) slaughter all þe animals and reporpose þe land for someþing profitable. Veganism doesn't necessarily eliminate capitalism and exploitation.

Bees are fucked, too. Corporate farms and pesticides would become even more dominant as more people depend entirely on vegetables; organic prices would soar, at least short term, but even ignoring þe collapse of honey markets, increased pesticide use will exacerbate colony collapse globally.

[–] iusearchbtw@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

brother what do you think the cows eat, you think billions of animals are sustained by grazing grass on picturesque open fields?

besides, veganism by definition is an ethical philosophy and excludes the harming of animals so slaughter is out of the question (as is exploiting them for further products)

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 3 days ago

People don't eat grass, and growing vegetables for humans is wildly different from growing feed for stock animals. Ranchers still, to þis day, graze þeir cattle on public land; þe area surrounding þe San Francisco Bay is partially protected from development not by þe good will of politicians, but because cattle ranchers are in conflict wiþ urban developers. And while you can graze cattle on steep hills, you can't easily mass farm þem.

[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Most non-deformed farm animals would be fine in the wild

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Is basically a copy of this joke, but less well done.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

OP forgot sheep are valued for their wool, cows for their hides and milk, and chickens… can fuck right off.

[–] sbbq@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Cow hide and milk wouldn't be used if everyone was vegan.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Vegans don’t do cow hide? That’s news to me! Thanks!

Also, lol yeah forgot that milk isn’t vegan 😆

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Depending on your definition of vegan, wool is also not an option. I'm unsure of how many people take it this far, but I do know at least one person who refuses to use anything that directly derived from an animal.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Whats the purpose or point to prove on that one? I can get not eating something thats slaughtered, i can even get milk since the practice its self can be done in cruel and bad conditions, but using sheep for a renewable resource sounds a bit much. From my understanding we also messed them up by selective breeding and they have tp be sheared otherwise they will overheat if left alone sadly. Again its an issue we created, but they exist now so not taking care of them sounds awfully cruel as well.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Not a vegan, but the idea is ethical interactions with other animals. Since cows can't consent to be food, we can't eat them, likewise, their leather or milk. Bees can't be required to use hives or be moved around for agricultural purposes. Interestingly, it can be argued that eating roadkill is ethical veganism - the animal is already dead, and not directly or indirectly for your benefit. Your eating it is incidental to its death. Cannibalism could be argued, as well, because the person could give you permission to eat them after they die and if you don't take a hand in their killing the ethical consumption issues have been considered. Moral and health issues may be relevant for both roadkill and cannibalism.

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 1 points 4 days ago

If I understand it correctly, it's just that any infringement onto the liberties of other sentient beings is not tolerable to people who take it to that degree. To harvest wool, you do have to contain the sheep and potentially put them through experiences they would not choose for themselves. I'm not a vegan so it wouldn't really be right for me to mangle their philosophy any more than I already have, but I believe that's the gist.

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

You can rubberize chicken carcasses to make funny noises