this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
155 points (98.7% liked)

politics

29616 readers
1513 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lindsay Garcia (D) on Thursday sued Gov. Jeff Landry (R) to block the suspension of the state’s House primary elections after the Supreme Court ruled that the state’s second majority-Black congressional district was an unconstitutional gerrymander. Garcia and voter Eugene Collins argue in their lawsuit that the elections were already in progress when Landry issued an executive order on Thursday. Garcia and Collins called the suspension unconstitutional, alleging that it violates the First, Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments, interferes with the timing of the election and nullifies absentee ballots. They urged the court to halt enforcement of the executive order, allow the elections to commence and count ballots already cast. They also called on refraining “from disenfranchising any qualified Louisiana voter or de-listing any qualified candidate in any contest on the May 16, 2026 or June 27, 2026 ballot.” “The State, in short, has no lawful predicate for the cancellation it has ordered,” their complaint reads. “It cannot conduct a primary under a remedial map that does not yet exist, in a remedial proceeding that has not yet begun, before a court that does not yet have jurisdiction.”

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kinda insane they're trying to change the rules for voting about 2 weeks before the election, when people have already started voting.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Makes perfect sense to someone who doesn't believe in democracy.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 8 points 1 day ago

It's because people might vote wrong.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wish I had that privilege where when I break the law you have to sue me instead of being able to call the cops about it.

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

In 2022 the Supreme Court decided in Merrill v Milligan that racially gerrymandered districts while recognized as being illegal, were allowed to be used anyways because of how close they were to an election.

When an election is close at hand, the rules of the road must be clear and settled. Late judicial tinkering with election laws can lead to disruption and to unanticipated and unfair consequences for candidates, political parties, and voters, among others.

  • Brett Kavanaugh

I wonder how consistent the court will be on preserving these districts.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

Funny how the Supreme Court can do this but not punish Trump during an election.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Trusting anyone to run elections in this climate with this administration and where it could go is unnerving. Of course, Blue states seem to be more above board, but maybe Fed would pull some crazy shit to “punish” states that let people excercise their right to vote.

[–] BigBrownDog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Judging by recent events, this will go all the way to the Supreme Court where they will rule in her favor. Right? RIGHT?!

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm not surprised that Republicans will try to cheat and do anything possible to avoid accountability (aka losing to Democrats in November as payback for how they've destroyed the country).

However, a primary is a private thing, it's not a government mandated event, so each party (which is a private entity), can do whatever they want within it.