But... both of those engines are terrible.
Pff, whatever.
this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)
Gaming
4797 readers
256 users here now
The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community
For news, discussions and memes!
Community Rules
This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:
- No NSFW content
You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.
What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:
- Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
- Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
- Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
- Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
- Collaboration: Whether you're here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.
If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The Creation Engine won because it meant they could make yet another game by reskinning the existing formula and tacking on a couple more, janky systems. I'm playing it again, though. It's alright with mods if you manage to ignore the steady trickle of bugs and nonsense.
The creation engine won because it’s an in-house engine. Why would Bethesda want to pay the licensing fees to Epic games lol.
They probably got a proposal on how great it is and how it can cut down labor costs, time and more bullshit. Fuck the c suites.
In the past, Bethesda has claimed that their engine allows them to move faster and do more because of their experience with it over the years.
I can see them combining that with their audience loving mods, and their embrace of paid mods as why they keep their engine.
Makes sense. But it sure does lead to the same sloppy stilted games that haven’t evolved enough to keep up with the times.
I really hate to praise bethesda these days, but it's good to see a studio still using an inhouse engine. Now if only that engine wasn't garbage.
Eh, the unreal engine is crap at RPGs.
It's really not good at friendly NPCs. Which fit all of its many faults, the creation engine is really good at.
Proof: The Outer Worlds 1+2. Both games hugely suffer from using the unreal engine.
The engine is holding them back. How many people in Bethesda really know how that taped together engine really works? And they act like they're getting games out quickly?
Starfields facial movements still aren't as good as a 20 year old call of duty game. If they got rid of the Todd I would immediately be 25% more likely to buy their next game.
Fuck Unreal 5. Bethesda games have already lost enough appeal as is.
I mean you're right on both accounts, but it's their determination to continue using that piece of shit engine that makes their games suck, especially on launch. If they would just scrap it entirely and build a new one from scratch, they'd be miles ahead of trying to keep that old yugo on the road by duct taping newer parts on and giving it a fresh layer of paint every now and then. People just keep giving Bethesda the benefit of the doubt.
Heck at this point they should just license s&box..
And then modders didn't give a fuck. Well there's a star wars mod that does well apparently but that's about it.