this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
331 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

84299 readers
3792 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lasta@piefed.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

From Deezer’s website, the detection system tags songs that are either fully AI generated rather than produced or mastered with the help of AI tools. You can also appeal if you believe your music was falsely flagged.

I strongly oppose the use of generative AI in art but if it has to be done, it should at least be labeled as AI (ideally by the “creator” themselves).

I wonder how accurate the AI detection tools are though, considering how common are posts where AI detection tools used in schools falsely flagged student assignments.

There was a song I quite liked which had several million views on YouTube which I was surprised to see was flagged as AI generated. No one I showed it to it could hear any obvious signs of AI. The main red flags were that the artists released several albums in a short time span and had no online presence on any platform you would expect to see musicians on (Bandcamp, Discogs, etc) besides YouTube and the streaming ones.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 30 points 1 week ago

The main red flags were that the artists released several albums in a short time span and had no online presence on any platform you would expect to see musicians on (Bandcamp, Discogs, etc) besides YouTube and the streaming ones.

Honestly, those seem like pretty big red flags since that is how actual bands manage to actually get paid.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I strongly oppose the use of generative AI in art but if it has to be done, it should at least be labeled as AI.

I know I’m mostly preaching to the choir here, but I don’t think there’s any situation in which AI ‘has’ to be used in art.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

With good mastering post, you can mostly eliminate the "Suno shimmer", but other than artists using local models, the big ones (Suno, Udio, et al) have digital fingerprinting in the audio file... which is also part of the reason for the "Suno shimmer" sound.

Also, Suno is partnered with WMG since November... their model has license.

[–] Forsho@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Tunes generated by LLM bots should never considered as music.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe they should stop allowing it

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're probably the one doing it. Of course the distribution owners would try and cut out the content makers.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Just read the article, it's not that hard:

Songs tagged as AI-generated on Deezer are automatically removed from algorithmic recommendations and not included in editorial playlists. The company announced today that it will no longer store hi-res versions of AI tracks.

[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

I have no idea what Deezer is, and I'm afraid if I ask, somebody is just going to say "DEEZER NUTS!!!" and I will realize it was a big prank.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is a less shitty alternative to Spotify, while costing less. They are also paying artists considerably more.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The last sentence is a little scary to me, not because it's a bad thing, but because it's probably catnip to scammers/AI generators. I hope they can do a good job of detecting it and keeping those scammers at bay, and not paying them for unaware listeners' mistakes

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 7 points 1 week ago

Not necessarily, if they are more hostile towards that kind of "content" than in this case Spotify, it isn't necessarily more attractive to AI scammers.

As far as I have read they do a lot to prevent that. AI "artists" (shartists?) don't show in the all tab when searching, don't get added to radio mixes, and dont get any payments from Deezer. Their AI generated tagging seems pretty accurate, I just wish it was exposed in the API so other projects could use it

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Self-gottem

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Music streaming like Spotify or Napster.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Spot deez nuts!

Nutster

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] navigator@piefed.zip 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And here I am struggling and fighting with my distributor ever time I upload a new instrumental album because they can’t confirm that it’s all original work.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Use someone else. If the AI royalty farmers can get thousands of AI generated tracks through without issue, then your real albums should be okay too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I personally started to use Qobuz. Their algorithm isn't great, their target group is more the more distinguished music listener but their library is pretty much as big as any others plus they do have the largest library of hi-res music too and they actually sell also hi-res and CD lossless music if that is of interest to you. Most importantly though, they have a "ban-AI-music" stance on their platform. Soon enough, one will have to rely on platforms like that if one does not want to wade through a sea of AI slop.

The downside is that Qobuz is a bit more expensive than others (while paying the most to artists however, as far as I know).

[–] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

I switched to Qobuz recently and started to actual discover new music again after years on Spotify.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheGreenWizard@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fuck me man, I guess I'll just never consume art again.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 4 points 1 week ago

Even if I tell you that Hans Zimmer is cooking Dune 3 score?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This (moreso for youtube music, since Deezer seems to not have a lot of East Asian labels signed) is a huge part of why I've been building out a selfhosted Navidrome.

Obviously there is the old school way of getting music. But Bandcamp is WAY more beneficial to the artists and ebay and Half Price Books are also awesome for grabbing music.

And combine all that with musicbrainz for scrobbling and discoverability of new bands.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 11 points 1 week ago
[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And this is not going to end even if they ban them. Mark those songs as AI and let people filter them out.

But we do need a new music service where every artist has to prove they are the ones making music on live stream and only then they are allowed to upload songs.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Mark those songs as AI and let people filter them out.

Deezer does just that. As per the article:

Songs tagged as AI-generated on Deezer are automatically removed from algorithmic recommendations and not included in editorial playlists. The company announced today that it will no longer store hi-res versions of AI tracks.

They've been working on systems to recognise AI songs for quite some time now.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Music is a weird art form, because something sounding familiar is very important to our ear. Many people have a really hard time liking music that is too foreign to their taste and end up sticking with only a select few genres.

Where familiarity is important, AI can deliver easily. I would think as much as we hate the idea, there is a pretty significant market for AI-generated music, specifically because it's so predictable and follows convention to a tee.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

There is indeed a market for people who don't care what is playing or who made it, and just want to hear the same familiar generic chords, rhythms, and vocals of whatever genre(s) they've grown up listening to. Not to be too blunt, but some people have no taste, and yes, they can eat slop and not notice the difference. Ok, good for them.

But those people are throwing fertilizer on AI weeds that will consume all the water and sunlight that nurtures actual music. That is really a problem.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] musket528@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i'm sure most people using streaming platforms don't care about it. a lot of people don't even know what their favorite genre is, they just play whatever is popular or getting into their feed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›