this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
387 points (98.3% liked)

interestingasfuck

9188 readers
3 users here now

For exceptionally interesting content

Rules:

  1. Posts must be interesting
  2. Posts must be based in reality
  3. No hateful content
  4. No harmful content
  5. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oascany@lemmy.world 76 points 2 weeks ago
[–] tahoe@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The fact that this is just a handheld iPhone video and not a professionally shot thing makes it so much more surreal

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Meh, I would have preferred they used a nice camera. Those Z9s they brought with them can shoot 8k video at 60 fps. When you’re something that’s once in a lifetime, for all of humanity, do it in the best quality possible.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Judging from first few seconds of this, I expected Cylon Raiders to come screaming across the horizon.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That part of the footage as not published.

The fact that the astronauts were replaced by cylons is also kept secret for now.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 4 points 2 weeks ago

And they have a plan!

[–] gnufuu@infosec.pub 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I πŸ§‘β€πŸ¦² am happy 😊 that you 🫡 put these emojis 😐, otherwise I πŸ§‘β€πŸ¦² wouldn't have understood 🀷

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I still don't understand this use of emoji.

It's not "I shoved a 🌡 up my πŸ†", I could get that, reject alphabet return to pictogram for the sake of compression if nothing else. But no, it's "I shoved a cactus 🌡 up my dick πŸ†" which is just...why are we doing this?

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's only compressing the message visually (it generally uses more data)

Also, at least for me, it takes more work to parse the images than words require. I have to like... shift out of reading mode, comprehend the image and then go back to reading.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How do emoji use more data? They're one, maybe two unicode characters?

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Than an entire word?

Take "cactus" for example. Each letter in the word "cactus" is one unicode character, for a total of six. 🌡 is one unicode character, U+1F335.

Unicode characters are 4 bytes long, so "cactus" takes 24 bytes to transmit, where "🌡" takes 4. Unless something something UTF_8?

[–] onlyhalfminotaur@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're close, Unicode characters don't imply a number of bytes, it's how they're encoded that does (utf-8 most commonly). Utf-8 can be as little as one byte or as many as four, depending on the specific character. I don't know about emojis but I imagine they're in the four bytes section. Where's "asdf" is also four bytes in utf-8.

So I just looked it up, the UTF-8 encoding for the cactus emoji is 4 bytes long: 0xF0 0x9F 0x8C 0xB5

Where the Latin alphabet is in the 1-byte region.

So it takes 6 bytes to transmit "cactus" in UTF-8, and only 4 to transmit β€œπŸŒ΅β€. So any emoji that replaces 5 or more letters is more efficient. πŸ† breaks even with "dick" or "cock", more efficient than "penis", more than twice as compact as "eggplant" or "aubergine".

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But that's not what people are doing

They always use a word and an emoji

Yes, to be clear I meant the example I gave where the word was replaced with the emoji was compression, not where they give the word and its emoji. That's as long-handed as possible.

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

πŸ‘‹ Are you a little bald headed baby ❓️

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Missed opportunity to use πŸ‘Ά

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

πŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ‘ΆπŸ—Ώ

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[–] Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.app 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What goes through your mind at that point? Like... the train of thought at that point had to be just wild.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

"Sure hope that's still there when we come around the back!"

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

I think its one of those moments that is awesome at the time, but it sticks with you forever and over time you appreciate it more and more.

[–] Madu@fedinsfw.app 1 points 2 weeks ago

"HOLY FUCKING SHIT"

I think that's most of it.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 11 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Does this make them the first people to never see the Earth?

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 weeks ago

No, the Apollo missions also circled the moon.

[–] bumblefumble@mander.xyz 21 points 2 weeks ago

No, I just closed my eyes.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

People sleep

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

I used to know a guy who saw the Earth once.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sadly, you can't see that anywhere actually on the moon, because of tidal locking.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Unless you run really fast.

And there's also the libration wobble.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Earthset." Fuck, that would be such a cool title for a sci-fi novel. I'm sure someone else has taken it already, but still, it's such a cool word.

I couldn’t find one, surprisingly. At least no popular title. However, there is an Asimov short Earthset and Evening Star, I could find no reasonable sources to preview the story.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

No Green Flash.

[–] LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Turn it landscape and it's even cooler.

[–] Technotica@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Shhhlooop... and gone

[–] Speiser0@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

In german when the sun sets, we say "die Sonne geht unter" (the sun goes below / the sun sinks). And for doomsday we say "die Welt geht unter" (the world goes below). What we're seeing here is doomsday.

Cool beans.

[–] Madu@fedinsfw.app 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Gotta say it's nice to be at a place online where half the comments aren't "obviously fake! Fake news! Everyone who believes this is a brainwashed sheep!" and so on, which they would (and I'm sure are) on Reddit, Youtube, Facebook etc. Not a single one here, it feels good.