this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
195 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15473 readers
438 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

This could be us but you playing

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

i look at this map every night before bed

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Used EV sales are on the rise and could theoretically replace ICE cars, but that obviously isn't very elastic and also relies (in the US) on foreign lithium.

So seconded: get fucked, car infrastructure, you absurdly wasteful source of energy dependence.

[–] thestrike@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

ok what are ICE cars LOL

electric cars also aren’t always the best if the electricity is generated by coal or something

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Internal Combustion Engine, if memory serves.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago

Chinga la migra!

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

electric cars also aren’t always the best if the electricity is generated by coal or something

Actually untrue. Because internal combustion engines (ICEs) are so inherently inefficient, even an EV powered 100% by electricity from a coal-fired plant (accounting for electrical transmission loss) comes out on top – and that assumption is ridiculously unrealistic.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 hours ago

The carbon cost of producing the EV is higher though, but yeah long term still better as long as you use it for like 5 years and don't get a new one whenever it comes out like it's an iPhone.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You still use coal for power like it's the 1800s? Solar panels are pretty cheap at this point.

Somehow, Trump is doing more to push renewables than any other president.

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I have a phev car, and I almost never charge it - 2.5h of charging and going to parking garage to unplug was too much of a cost to be offset by "almost free" 50km of range. Guess who is charging the car now?

[–] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Internal Combustion Engine cars.. ie ~~carbohydrate~~ hydrocarbon burners.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I think you mean hydrocarbon*

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 hours ago

yeah you want a carbohydrate-burning vehicle you get a bicycle

[–] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Fair. I am foreign, we call it benzine.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Benzene is a type of hydrocarbon, so neither is wrong.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So Italian cars? If only I could put pasta in my car, instead of gasoline...

[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I think it only affects 20% of supply globally, so why can't we adapt?

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

Because capitalism is not designed around planning for events like this. Global trade is meant primarily for profits of the capitalist class. This means they remove redundancies that would provide stability to maximize profits.

This is a very simple explanation. But it's why there is nothing in place prepared for this.

"Adapting" just be further capital consolidation as the working class suffers all of the losses and the capitalist class is protected in their bubble. They don't plan for events like this, because they are able to whither the storm.

Their wealth is not measured in dollars. Their wealth is a reflection of how much more power they have over the working class of the world. Events like this only serve to solidify that power unless the working class of the world fights back.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 hours ago

Pretty depressing hearing the media about it here. Countless people were killed in missile strikes across the middle east today, now we talk about the real issue, petrol prices have gone up slightly.