this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
135 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

82518 readers
3929 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/44116850

The insane AI push is purely driven by fear of being left behind.

No one is actually stopping to ask whether it is all worth it.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

No one is stopping to ask whether it's all worth it? ... Actually, I think millions of us make comments to that extent every day. We're kind of upset that these scam artists are dominating the stock market enough to fuck with our retirement plans. If the rich people were gambling with their own money, that would be stellar. But they aren't. And... I sure wish we could stop them.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 2 hours ago

The dot-com bubble burst, but...well, it got better.

Of course there were some casualties (famously pets.com), but Microsoft, Cisco, Intel, Amazon...yeah they got their clock cleaned at the time, but long term they were pretty successful.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, the people is charge are gobsmackingly stupid.

You would fire any employee for this level of incompetence. For some strange reason meritocracy doesn't exist at the leadership level anymore when that is the most important place for it.

Every company still investing in AI knowing their is no return should be broken up and disbanded at this point for gross financial negligence.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This tells me that each of them believes he alone is the stable genius master of the universe who will get out with exactly the right timing. Which is actually just another way of stating something I already knew: that they are psychopaths.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 9 hours ago

"Everyone deludes themselves into thinking it could work for them, and it never does. But maybe it'll work for us."

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 44 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

25% of CEOs know they're throwing money away, but can't stop because 100% of CEOs are throwing money away.

[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Are you really a rockstar CEO if you're not throwing money away like all the other CEOs are throwing money away? In fact, you better throw it away harder.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

And in larger quantities 🤣

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

The problem with betting against it is that "the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent"

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

So ignore it. Invest in companies that do actual material things that make money, and ignore the scams and bubbles

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 24 points 14 hours ago

As long as it bursts after the bonus clears

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So the forerunners in innovation just do whatever everybody else is doing.

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. Monkey see monkey do.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 4 points 12 hours ago

Those NFT apes come to mind

[–] artyom@piefed.social 14 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not driven by fear, it's arrogance. They think they won't be caught holding the bag. They continue investing because the stock will continue going up because people keep investing. It's purely speculative gambling. No one in this entire industry cares if it ever turns a profit. Pichai just got a $692M payday, despite not gaining a single dollar of profit from AI.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

This is mostly true for CEOs of for-profit corporations. But there are plenty of government orgs and non-profits also going hard on AI. They are afraid of falling behind and are trying to "make fetch happen" even though they don't really have an answer for what AI will do for them.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 10 hours ago

one in five CEOs said they expect to make job cuts this year, though only 9% of those said they expect the layoffs to be the result of AI adoption.

An actual number. Nice to see a little honesty.

That figure seems optimistically low, given the role the technology has played in job cuts at...

Here we go.

Block

A company owned by a cryptocurrency and "current thing" enthusiast Jack Dorsey

Meta

Literally an AI company

Amazon

This is a lie

Pinterest,Autodesk, and many others.

Yeah sure

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

From the low/high IQ bell curve meme... "I'm smart enough to sell before the bubble bursts"

[–] ozoned@piefed.social 4 points 14 hours ago

Oh they're finally admitting it? Ok, so we're at least seeing progress that it is in fact a bubble. So we're along the bubble highway. How much longer before the rich get tired of throwing that money away?

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I followed AI developments in the beginning, but it felt like really effective use cases were always just out of reach.

Last time I was using AI was before "Agentic" AI was a thing (it was just around the corner).

Can anyone clue me in, is AI still making forward progress? I feel like if there was a massive change or breakthrough it would be HUGE news, but I also imagine slow incremental progress could eventually build up to being a breakthrough.

I understand that it is still way too prone to errors and hallucinations to be trusted with serious tasks, but have there been any noteworthy improvements?

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

LLM-based coding agents have become useful to the point that people are building large software projects without humans writing or reviewing code directly. The naive approach to that will result in disaster if used in a production environment, but practices to improve reliability are evolving.

Popular opinion seems to be that Claude Opus 4.5 was the tipping point for this.

[–] DireTech@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

I like AI. I think it's great for quick references or a starting point, but I've already seen projects scrapped and restarted because a bunch of junior devs used AI with no understanding and management gave up on them after a year where the number of significant bugs never decreased. Take one down, feed it to the AI, two more bugs in the tracker.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Just YOLO until FAFO.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

It's more because of imbecilic investors. You can't get 5 euros to do something useful, but you can easily get 10 if you commit to throwing 5 down the AI drain.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

You never know at what stage of the bubble you are. Will it burst in one year or five?