This was really the best thinking of the time? Dump chemical weapons where we get food from?
Public Health
For issues concerning:
- Public Health
- Global Health
- Health Systems & Policy
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- etc.
🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.
Related Communities
- Medical Community Hub
- Medicine
- Medicine Canada
- Premed
- Premed Canada
- Public Health (📍)
See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)
Rules
Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.
Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content
Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!
They also dumped nuclear waste there iirc. The barrels floated up, so they fired machine guns at them to make sure they sunk. The solution to polition is dilution! That was a common theme from the 20's to the 20's.
I was also hoping that the article would explain why. I was guessing that with certain chemicals, it might dilute it enough to become harmless.
But instead, the closest I found was this, which cited cost as the reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submerged_munitions
I'd like to see a comparison of the long term economic costs of these accidents with just dealing with them early on. Or even entombing them the way we do nuclear waste.
I also found this article and map
https://nonproliferation.org/chemical-weapon-munitions-dumped-at-sea/
