this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
11 points (92.3% liked)

UK Politics

5367 readers
153 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why is the Guardian using kid gloves and calling them hard right? It's a bullshit label like alt-right all over again.

They're fucking far right, fascists.

https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/media-misuse-of-hard-right-label-risks-normalising-extremist-views-study-says

[–] meejle@piefed.world 2 points 22 hours ago

I just checked their style guide (it's an Autistic fascination of mine 😅)… funnily enough, they specifically recommend using "far-right" over "alt-right". But they don't have an entry for "far-right", and I couldn't find any mention of "hard right".

“alt-right”
use once and in quotes at first mention; use far right at any subsequent mentions. Note: far right (noun) and far-right (adjective). More specific descriptions can be used where relevant when mentioning individuals associated with the movement, but such descriptions should be evidence-based.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck FPTP. They are on 24% nationwide, projections of vast majority are total bonkers.

Either introduce proportional representation or at least second stage of the election (for 2 top candidates) if no candidate achieves over 50% in the first stage.

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

But... but... but... wouldn't that affect the "landslides" and "mandates" of governments elected with 30% of the vote? How would they justify their rule without such hyperbolic terms?