this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
42 points (100.0% liked)

Science

23747 readers
62 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Art by Dani Navarro, support human-made, scientifically accurate paleoart

https://nitter.net/playerDNG

Layperson article

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/02/260222092251.htm

Primary source (paywalled)

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adx5486

Excerpts from primary article

Editor’s summary Recent descriptions of and debates about the massive, fish-eating dinosaur Spinosaurus have brought this striking predator to the forefront of the dinosaur pantheon. Its huge size and distinctive morphology have stimulated much debate about the degree to which it lived an aquatic lifestyle. Sereno et al. describe a crested fossil Spinosaurus found in northern Africa as a new species. The researchers argue that this group of dinosaurs underwent three phases of evolution with increasing aquatic adaptations and existence in habitats around the Tethys Sea. —Sacha Vignieri

INTRODUCTION The fossils of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, a giant sail-backed, fish-eating theropod dinosaur from northern Africa, have inspired competing lifestyle interpretations, either as a semiaquatic ambush predator stalking shorelines and shallows or a fully aquatic predator in pursuit of prey underwater. Its bones and teeth have been found only in coastal deposits near marine margins, a locale potentially consistent with either lifestyle interpretation.

RATIONALE In the central Sahara, a new fossiliferous area (Jenguebi) was discovered in beds equivalent in age [Farak Formation; Cenomanian ~95 million years ago (Mya)] to those yielding fossil remains of S. aegyptiacus. We describe from this area a new species, Spinosaurus mirabilis sp. nov., which is very similar to S. aegyptiacus in skeletal form but with a much taller, scimitar-shaped cranial crest. Two new sauropods were found in close association with the new spinosaurid buried in fluvial sediments indicative of an inland riparian habitat.

RESULTS S. mirabilis sp. nov. is distinguished by the low profile of its snout, a hypertrophied nasal-prefrontal crest, greater spacing of posterior maxillary teeth, and other features. Its features highlight the extraordinary specializations of both species of the genus Spinosaurus, including interdigitating upper and lower teeth. Principal component analysis of body proportions places spinosaurids between semiaquatic waders (e.g., herons) and aquatic divers (e.g., darters) distant from all other predatory dinosaurs. A time-calibrated phylogenetic analysis resolves three evolutionary phases: an initial Jurassic radiation when their distinctive elongate fish-snaring skull evolved and split into two distinctive designs, baryonychine and spinosaurine; an Early Cretaceous circum-Tethyan diversification when both reigned as dominant predators; and a final early Late Cretaceous phase when spinosaurines attained maximum body size as shallow water ambush specialists limited geographically to northern Africa and South America.

CONCLUSION The discovery of the tall-crested S. mirabilis sp. nov. in a riparian setting within an inland basin supports a lifestyle interpretation of a wading, shoreline predator with visual display an important aspect of its biology. At the end of the Cenomanian about 95 million years ago, an abrupt eustatic rise in sea level and the attendant climate change brought the spinosaurid radiation to an end.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bishop_Owl@hexbear.net 2 points 2 hours ago

I am not going to argue in this thread. I am capable of appreciating when other people find my special interest fun and exciting. Curiosity is a good thing, and I am not going to be a dinosaur scold.

[–] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Record scratch...

So you're probably wondering how I got here...

[–] micnd90@hexbear.net 6 points 8 hours ago

spoilerDon't worry, I'm not real. I'm a mere figment of a paleoartist's imagination

[–] naom3@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Ok but like, if they were ambush predators wouldn’t the eponymous spines stand out and alert their prey? How did they hide them?

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't need to hide the sail from fish if the primary food is fish.

My guess is that the sail's purpose is temperature regulation, it being above water could collect heat from the sun and surface area would matter for that.

[–] trompete@hexbear.net 1 points 5 hours ago

Wouldn't it be more likely for cooling?

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago

I would imagine a wading coastal predator may not have had any evolutionary advantage to developing feathers, especially not as early as 95 MYA.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 8 points 9 hours ago

That's a picture of a perfectly normal cassowary

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 9 points 10 hours ago

Such a silly sausage

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And its fuccen sicc its a unicorn spinosaurus