this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

AskHistorians

1263 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I always thought the opposite, that they weren’t allowed to as that was a job more appropriate for a Sargent. That not only it was against articles of war but it was conduct unbecoming. Not for moral reasons, obviously, but as a holdover from the lords/upper classes being officers and it being beneath them.

It’s referenced in Sharpe’s rifles based during the Napoleonic wars. Sharpe an officer made up from the ranks is looked down on by the other officers who are all mostly lords/wealthy with the odd prince thrown in. He gets into a fight with a regular rifleman who’s hungover and mistakes him for a typical soft officer. He’s then chastised by another pair of officers for brawling with the “common soldiery” or something to that effect. Seems like a good idea to prevent lords newly minted as officers making the mistake and getting mauled by actual soldiers.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

While physical violence was still accepted as a means of discipline in many militaries, the issue was that Patton slapped a man in medical who was suffering for PTSD because Patton believed PTSD wasn't 'real'.

Even by the low mental health standards of WW2, that was fucking abhorrent.