this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
10 points (91.7% liked)

Investigative Journalism

77 readers
17 users here now

A place to post long form investigative journalism.

Rule 1: Be excellent to each other.

Rule 2: Can be podcasts, videos or articles. Post what it is in the tile as first thing.

Rule 3: Must be a good source. No far right or Russian tied outlets.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Some had crossed into the country from Mexico many months earlier without prior approval from US immigration authorities, then applied for asylum. Though traditionally considered legal under international and US immigration law, the Trump administration had announced that most people who entered this way in the past two years could no longer get asylum and could be arrested in courthouses. The move shocked, confused and angered advocates for immigrants’ rights. It gave the agents license to grab even more people, and to send them to detention and deportation. By late June, when I saw Rodriguez, this was happening routinely.

The judge asked Rodriguez if two of the immigrants who had made the Mexico-to-US crossing were now banned from further pursuing their asylum claims. “It appears that they are,” Rodriguez said in a flat voice.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kvasir476@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I thought all lawyers did was study old cases? You'd think they would have at least a passing knowledge of the Nuremberg Trials.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

Exactly the same line of defense as Eichmann