this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
228 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

80859 readers
2978 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There have been a lot of complaints about both the competency and the logic behind the latest Epstein archive release by the DoJ: from censoring the names of co-conspirators to censoring pictures of random women in a way that makes individuals look guiltier than they really are, forgetting to redact credentials that made it possible for all of Reddit to log into Epstein’s account and trample over all the evidence, and the complete ineptitude that resulted in most of the latest batch being corrupted thanks to incorrectly converted Quoted-Printable encoding artifacts, it’s safe to say that Pam Bondi’s DoJ did not put its best and brightest on this (admittedly gargantuan) undertaking. But the most damning evidence has all been thoroughly redacted… hasn’t it? Well, maybe not.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 32 minutes ago

Anyone knows why they released them at all? What does the administration get from it?

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The best and brightest don't work there anymore.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 14 points 11 hours ago

Or, malicious compliance by someone with a moral compass. Best is to somehow leak documents wholesale. But if that's not possible, I think the next best way to all but guarantee that the information gets out is to do a lousy job censoring, and let "The Internet" do the rest. It also makes the administration look even more stupid, especially in the eyes of technically minded folks.

But yeah, not the best and brightest, that's certainly a possibility.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 66 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

tl;dr there's a bunch of base64-encoded PDFs in the Epstein emails. Buddy had a hard time extracting them because the files are exported as images and the one and ell characters are almost indistinguishable.

Dude eventually managed to distinguish them. 🤷‍♂️

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 27 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah I read all that and he never even shared any unredacted docs.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Craked ... unredacted, from them, here :

(( Mout Sinai Dubin breast center 2012 invitation form ... )) :
https://archive.org/details/dbc-12-one-page-invite-with-reply
as i explained in other comment here at OOP s' post

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Just an invitation to a party?

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 5 points 12 hours ago

A breast cancer party

[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Nobody ever has AFAIK.

Was this "poorly redacted" thing just a hoax from the outset? Perhaps even started by MAGA HQ to get us too exhausted by false and innocuous findings so that when the real paydirt hits the screens the swinging voters will be too jaded to care?

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

No the poorly redacted ones were real, from the first release. They were not redacted by the DOJ, they were old court documents. Afaik all of them were also already released unredacted.

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

What about decoding each of the areas both ways and test the amount of entropy in each instance?

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 23 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

EFTA00400459 has been cracked, DBC12.pdf liberated ( 2026 February 7 )
https://neosmart.net/blog/efta00400459-has-been-cracked-dbc12-pdf-liberated/

That is from the very end of 1st blog :

UPDATE This was solved last night (). You can read about it in the follow-up to (this...linked above) article.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 17 points 12 hours ago

tl;dr there was nothing in the decrypted file of interest- BUT it shows that more files may be recoverable. Impressive work, love to see it! <3