Space

2117 readers

58 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.

Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography

Other Cool Links

Astronomy Picture of the Day Archive
Live Space Dashboard

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

'Textbooks will need to be updated': Jupiter is smaller and flatter than we thought, Juno spacecraft reveals (www.livescience.com)

submitted 2 hours ago by cm0002@literature.cafe to c/space@mander.xyz

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Jupiter is slightly smaller and flatter than scientists thought for decades, a new study finds.

Researchers used radio data from the Juno spacecraft to refine measurements of the solar system's largest planet. Although the differences between the current and previous measurements are small, they are improving models of Jupiter's interior and of other gas giants like it outside the solar system, the team reported Feb. 2 in the journal Nature Astronomy.

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ColorOfACarrot@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Honestly, I am so tired of the "textbooks will need to be updated" headline every time we find a tiny rounding error in space. We are talking about a difference of 12 kilometers on a planet that is 140,000 kilometers wide. If your textbook is so precise that a 0.01 percent change matters, you probably aren't reading a standard textbook anyway.

Don't get me wrong, Juno is an incredible piece of hardware and the fact that we can measure something that far away down to a few hundred meters is mind-blowing. I love that we're getting better models of the interior. But the way science journalism frames every single data refinement as some world-shattering revelation is just exhausting. It is iterative science. It is literally how the process is supposed to work.

Also, calling it flatter is just going to give the "Flat Earth" trolls more fuel for their weird memes. Great. Can't wait for the "Jupiter is a pancake" posts to start flooding the conspiracy sub-communities. Just what we needed.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think this is important. Many science history textbooks highlight that the ancients got the measures right by 5% off or that the modern era scientists got the quantity of oxidation (phlogistic) off by 5%. So it's important to note that we are actually advancing in Science and that we are finding new horizons, not just repeating what the ancients or modern era scientists did.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 34 minutes ago

Sure, but it's not "textbooks need to be updated" important.