this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
23 points (92.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

40155 readers
721 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 1 points 23 minutes ago

I don't think so. He is a pathologic narcissist, which means that he needs all attention directed at himself, regardless of the nature of that attention. He doesn't really register embarrassment as most of us do, only whether it caused people to focus their attention on him or not.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe, but I tend to think it more typical of pathological narcissists to be only vaguely aware of such things. There is no shame; there is no self-examination, but there might be a more practical sense of 'this might possibly hurt my position or self-interests.'

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Im not claiming to know his internal machinations but the man has consistently been in the most embarrassing situations beyond whatever I thought was possible for a US president. At this point he either gets off on it or he has no other choice as a result of blackmail or something.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

From what I understand, he's been like this the vast bulk of his life. For example, back at Wharton he was evidently a dreadful student, but Fred's money was enough to prop up his degree, anyway. In that situation I think most people would otherwise have been somewhat or very much humiliated by crashing out like that, but for him, it was one in a long series of situations, feeling empowered by exceptionalism, considering himself 'special' for being able to break the common rules with impunity, and do whatever he wanted. Just look at the beauty pageant shenanigans and countless other examples to see situations where embarrassment just doesn't seem to register with him. All part of the elitist mindset of 'rules and norms are for other people; they don't apply to me.'

For decent people, I'm sure it makes perfect sense to otherwise interpret much of that as an embarrassment kink, but (again) I think it's more a case of it largely not registering with people like that. Also kind of goes hand in hand with being a professional bullshit artist-- as in, they can do the worst things right in front of you, with the confidence of being able to persuade you that you didn't actually see what you just witnessed. And its not just being a good BS artist at that point; it's also a case of being backed by real wealth, power, influence, and underlying threats, persuading loads of people to keep showing him the knee even years ago. And that gets normalized over time...

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Like I said. I dont know the mechanism but its sure as hell looks like he gets off on it.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Hence my 1st sentence, 2nd para. Anyway, I did try to directly explain the mechanisms, but of course that's just one person's POV. Cheers.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 46 minutes ago

I never asked you to explain. Cheers.