this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
63 points (98.5% liked)

Politics

1133 readers
468 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What? Headquartered in Toronto, the technology and media giant has three active contracts with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. One, awarded in 2021, covers a “law enforcement investigative database subscription. Another, awarded in 2023, is for “risk mitigation services.” A third, awarded in 2025, is for a “maritime analysis tool” and “subject matter expert support services to the support the homeland security investigations, operation national initiative for illicit trade enforcement program.”

How much? The 2021 contract is worth US$22.8 million. The 2023 contract has seen Thomson Reuters awarded US$2.7 million to date, and has a potential award amount of US$4.6 million. The 2025 contract has so far garnered the media giant US$1.8 million, with a potential award amount of $3.6 million. Together, the three contracts are worth a potential US$31 million.

Canadian government money? Yes. Thomson Reuters has received hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal government contracts since 2022, largely for subscriptions, data and database access services.

Response? Thomson Reuters did not respond to a request for comment.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lol_idk@piefed.social -5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Says the person on Substack

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So's a shitload of people across all ideologies and levels of integrity as well as competence.

Including for example Ken Klippenstein and "Ethan Coen" reviewing Joel Cohen's first solo project as "Joel Coen’s shittiest movie by several billion light years. If all the elephants in all the world crapped into the same canyon for 100 years, you would still not have a pile of shit half a large as Joel Coen’s dumb-as-a-dog-dick rendering of this classic tale“

It's just a newsletter platform 🤷

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

The receipts are in the article.