this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
28 points (88.9% liked)

Public Health

1687 readers
16 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trditional plaster casts have remained unchanged for largely over a century

Um, first of all I haven't seen a plaster cast in 40 years, they've been fiberglass at least that long, which means they weigh 1/4 of a plaster cast.

Second, we've been using other braces instead, like plastics with Velcro wraps that can be removed to clean a wound or just the skin.

I don't trust when people are disingenuous about current state of things to promote their solution as so much better.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

Or they do a partial fiberglass 60% of the circumference and wrap that so it can be removed. Its honestly great, there is little need to change it.

Maybe if it was a true 3d scan to print, that had it ready in 10 minutes, I could see that. But that would still be better as a mesh rather than whatever this is.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

Sounds expensive

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Anyone got data on the plastic content and recyclability of Kevlar?

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Quick online search found an article about the environmental impact of kevlar

https://shunwaste.com/article/how-does-kevlar-affect-the-environment

Kevlar, a lightweight and incredibly strong synthetic fiber widely used in bulletproof vests, aerospace, and automotive industries, has significant environmental implications. Its production involves the use of harsh chemicals and energy-intensive processes, contributing to pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, Kevlar is non-biodegradable, leading to long-term waste management challenges when discarded. While it offers durability and reduces the need for frequent replacements in certain applications, its lifecycle—from raw material extraction to disposal—raises concerns about resource depletion and ecological impact. Understanding these effects is crucial for developing sustainable alternatives and mitigating its environmental footprint.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This stuff isn't getting recycled, we barely manage recycling PET bottles, a pretty pure material and ubiquitous material, and that's mostly down cycled to polyester fiber which isn't really recycled unless you count burning trash as recycling.

Maybe there is some opportunity for reuse as claimed in the article.