this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
32 points (100.0% liked)

theory

912 readers
2 users here now

A community for in-depth discussion of books, posts that are better suited for !literature@www.hexbear.net will be removed.

The hexbear rules against sectarian posts or comments will be strictly enforced here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hop in, comrades, we are reading Capital Volumes I-III this year, and we will every year until Communism is achieved. (Volume IV, often published under the title Theories of Surplus Value, will not be included, but comrades are welcome to set up other bookclubs.) This works out to about 6½ pages a day for a year, 46 pages a week.

I'll post the readings at the start of each week and @mention anybody interested. Let me know if you want to be added or removed.

Week 2, Jan 8-14, we are reading Volume 1, Chapter 2 & Chapter 3 Sections 1 & 2.

Discuss the week's reading in the comments.

Use any translation/edition you like. Marxists.org has the Moore and Aveling translation in various file formats including epub and PDF.

AernaLingus says: I noticed that the linked copy of the Fowkes translation doesn't have bookmarks, so I took the liberty of adding them myself. You can either download my version with the bookmarks added or if you're a bit paranoid (can't blame ya) and don't mind some light command line work you can use the same simple script that I did with my formatted plaintext bookmarks to take the PDF from libgen and add the bookmarks yourself. Also, please let me know if you spot any errors with the bookmarks so I can fix them!


Resources

(These are not expected reading, these are here to help you if you so choose)


2024 Archived Discussions

If you want to dig back into older discussions, this is an excellent way to do so.

Archives:

Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10Week 11Week 12Week 13Week 14Week 15Week 16Week 17Week 18Week 19Week 20Week 21Week 22Week 23Week 24Week 25Week 26Week 27Week 28Week 29Week 30Week 31Week 32Week 33Week 34Week 35Week 36Week 37Week 38Week 39Week 40Week 41Week 42Week 43Week 44Week 45Week 46Week 47Week 48Week 49Week 50Week 51Week 52


2025 Archived Discussions

If you want to dig back into older discussions, this is an excellent way to do so.

Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10Week 11Week 12Week 13Week 14Week 15Week 16Week 17Week 18Week 19Week 20Week 21Week 22Week 23Week 24Week 25Week 26Week 27Week 28Week 29Week 30Week 31Week 32Week 33Week 34Week 35Week 36Week 37Week 38Week 39Week 40Week 41Week 42Week 43Week 44Week 45Week 46


2026 Archived Discussions

Just joining us? You can use the archives below to help you reading up to where the group is. There is another reading group on a different schedule at https://lemmygrad.ml/c/genzhou (federated at !genzhou@lemmygrad.ml ) which may fit your schedule better. The idea is for the bookclub to repeat annually, so there's always next year.

Week 1

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)
[–] qcop@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

oh shit. I forgot it’s the new year already. Could you add me to the list please? I’m not sure I’ll have enough time but fuck it I’ll try anyway.

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

You can still get a lot out of Das Kapital even if you just read a little bit. It's very dense, despite being so long.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just got the book, so going to try to join in! Can you add me to the mention list? Will try to crack it open and catch up this week.

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

you're on the list now, btw

[–] SteamedHamberder@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

We start off with a lot of definitions and examples. But something I came to appreciate is that Marx and Dickens in the Christmas Carol share a similar message(and a similar time/place in the early history of capitalism): that commodities and money may have “value” as a medium of exchange, but ultimately don’t have value for civilization and humanity.

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

how does this apply in the era of fiat currency? or rather, what's changed?

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Since fiat money didn't really exist in Marx's time (it was many decades away), there wasn't much reason for him to explicitly talk about it's implications in Capital. Marx doesn't think the anchor to the value of precious metals are as tight as some of the economists and businessmen of the day assume, and that in fact there is quite a bit of float in the exchange value of money. But the completely unmoored nature of fiat money is something that he probably didn't anticipate.

It's not super relevant for the arguments made in Vol 1. At the level of workers interacting with their bosses, it's not so different from gold standard money.

But certainly has implications for the circulation of capital as discussed in Vol 2 and credit money as discussed in Vol 3. There's a few lines of thought about it among modern marxists; here's a whole book of essays on the subject. If there's any consensus about it, it's that fiat money accelerates growth and instability, and that it implies a much larger role for the state than Marx might have anticipated.

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

does fiat currency arise as a result of imperialism? obviously it arose during the era of imperialism but is there a causal relationship there? or is there no consensus about that?

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not a precondition for imperialism. The European powers did most of their imperial conquering while they had gold standard currencies. And historically, you have the major European powers losing control of their empires shortly after they float their currencies.

Vol 1 has some more stuff on Imperialism in the last few chapters.

i was thinking the other way around. it took me a while to get to this but from the very end of chapter 3 section 2:

One thing is, however, requisite; this token must have an objective social validity of its own, and this the paper symbol acquires by its forced currency. This compulsory action of the State can take effect only within that inner sphere of circulation which is coterminous with the territories of the community, but it is also only within that sphere that money completely responds to its function of being the circulating medium, or becomes coin.

this would suggest that imperialism is a necessary precondition for fiat currency to flourish. this seems correct to me because it seems as though the gold standard has been replaced with the dollar standard. then the congealed human labor of the miner as represented by the gold would be replaced by the congealed human labor of something else, i think? maybe it's the labor represented in the us market as a whole? that's where i get lost