this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

981 readers
508 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal judge has blocked a new Texas law aimed at shielding minors from inappropriate online content from taking effect as scheduled on Jan. 1, ruling that it likely violates First Amendment free speech rights.

U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman said in a 20-page ruling that the Computer & Communications Industry Association, which filed a lawsuit against the legislation enacted this year, is likely to succeed at trial. But Pitman also made clear that the intent of the legislation, Senate Bill 2420, was sound.

"(T)he Court recognizes the broad support for protecting children when they use apps," Pitman wrote. "But the means to achieve that end must be consistent with the First Amendment."

Under SB 2024, app stores would be required to verify users' age before they can create an account. It also says that minors' account must be affiliated with a parent’s account and that a parent must consent before a minor can download or make purchases through the use of an app.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

This framing of protecting children is simply so that it's easy to attack the opponents of these privacy destroying surveillance bills.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

This rocks

"Broad support for protecting children" doesn't mean censorship this shows why we need to speak up against these awful laws and propose and implement real solutions