(sorry for the low quality image, despite seeing it a lot on Reddit this was the best one I could find online)
this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
688 points (97.1% liked)
me_irl
7125 readers
276 users here now
All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Found you a better quality one.
:0
Where did you find this?
I reverse searched your image and found one with the highest quality. I think this one came from Instagram. :)
I tried to search for it by describing it so that's probably why the Insta post didn't show up.
Tysm!
Is "Needs more JPEG" going to become sign that it's not AI?
I think ai will be very good at adding jpeg artifacts.
I wish society judged people who don't tag AI art the same way we judge those who fail to tag NSFW or spoiler content.
Lemmy and Piefed should add an AI tag and an option not to see it
I think piefed already has.
Waow
Whoa I wonder if the blorp client supports it
Blorp dev here. Could you do me a favor and link some example AI posts and I'll see if I can add a filter for them. I also want to add a toggle to filter out bot posts. I'll do those at the same time.
To be honest I don't often see AI posts on here.
Does piefed in the webbrowser have a way to tag a post as AI, the same way that posts can be tagged NSFW? When you are creating a post?
I did see an example of a bot-tagged post earlier. I'll try to find it.
Looks like they do have a toggle for AI generated. I can add a checkbox for that when creating posts via Blorp. I can find some bot posts, and I should be able to create some AI tagged posts for testing. Thanks!
If they knowingly posted AI generated shit, I feel it's more akin to posting an image someone else made, removing the watermark, and claiming you drew the image than simply not labeling porn as NSFW.
You could also just not know it is AI and thus not know to tag it as AI, unlike if you posted porn not tagged nfsw.
This is truly the worst timeline.
It's self-inflicted.
Did you make computer generated art easily accessible? If not, how did you self-inflict it on yourself? 🤔
load more comments
(4 replies)
I'd rather see a basic drawing that gets the point across than an ai image
Anyone with a functioning brain would. The only people that would disagree are the psychopaths that are incapable of appreciating value in anything.
The really noxious thing about AI is how it will latch onto anything that is popular and turn it into shitty 9gag memes at lightning speed.
So in things like this I typically hold the view of judging something based on the final product regardless of how it was made.
But every time I realize something's AI, even if it looks good, it feels like all the color and depth has been sucked out. Like realizing it has no soul, that I'm staring at a husk.
To put it in more technical terms, the realization immediately halts any deeper analysis and appreciation for the work. The question of "What meaning does this background detail has?" always has the same answer of "It was the most probable filler for that area".
It made me truly realize how much I took for granted that every part of a human art piece has a story behind it, whether intentional or not.
For me it doesn't matter how an image was generated, but it matters if the image is lying to me.
If something is incredible or unbelievable, then label it as real or generated.
If it's just some art, then I don't care much. I'm not going to dis/like based on how it was generated.
AI images are often not labeled regardless of whether they're trying to mimic real life or mimic art. Someone who knowingly posts AI images is lying to you about who made the image, it's specially worse when they're unlabeled
A piece of art and an AI-generated image are two very different things that can often look the same, because that's what generative AI is made for: mimicking what humans make, a computer lying about its identity as a computer, and pretending to be human. Every AI image is a lie.
view more: next ›