this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)

Typography

324 readers
1 users here now

Type design, setting, fonts, etc.

Civility is aggressively enforced: do not be rude, troll-y, flame-bait-y, etc. If someone else is, please report, block as necessary, and move on.

Comments that cannot reasonably lead to discussion or which have no analysis ("first!", "lol", [string of emojis]) will be deleted. Please do not post them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] halfdane@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

While the article is actually well written, so you really should give it a go, the answer it gives is in short: "no"

Slightly longer:

... But the new fonts—and the odd assortment of paraphernalia that came before them—assume that dyslexia is a visual problem rooted in imprecise letter recognition. That’s a myth, explains Joanne Pierson, a speech-language pathologist at the University of Michigan. “Contrary to popular belief, the core problem in dyslexia is not reversing letters (although it can be an indicator),” she writes. The difficulty lies in identifying the discrete units of sound that make up words and “matching those individual sounds to the letters and combinations of letters in order to read and spell.”

In other words, dyslexia is a language-based processing difference, not a vision problem, despite the popular and enduring misconceptions. “Even when carefully explained, soundly discredited, or decisively dispatched, these and similar dyslexia myths and their vision-based suppositions seem to rise from the dead—like the villain-who-just-won’t-die trope in a B movie,” the International Dyslexia Association forcefully asserts. ...