this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
36 points (95.0% liked)

Australia

4595 readers
90 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yeah whoever approved this needs to be sacked. Pro Palestine protests get scrutinised but literal nazis get approved. Get fucked.

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They should receive a criminal charge, if it can be proven that they should have reasonably known that it was for a nazi event.

We do not have un-checked freedom of speech in this country.

Nazi speech is illegal.

[–] star@aussie.zone 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Agreed. A known leader of a neo-Nazi organisation registered a protest. The group have a history of registering events under false pretenses but there's no excuse for this one. It was obvious.

Nazi speech is illegal.

It should be.

But fascists know their worldview is revolting to the public and parts of it are illegal to plainly say. That's why they use pseudo-runes and sonnenrads instead of swastikas, talk about removing instead of exterminating, and protest around secondary positions like 'mass immigration' to spread racial supremacy rhetoric. They've been playing this game for a hundred years. Nazi speech is legal if you're careful about it.

The problem is what they're doing, not how they're doing it, and our law struggles to handle that.

[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago

It should be

It is somewhat but it may need to be revised.

Section 93ZAA of the Crimes Act, which took effect in August, makes it an offence to publicly incite hatred towards another person or group on the grounds of race.

Spot on with the rest though. These shit heels are specialised at weaselling their foot into doors.

[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No argument here. Even if they didn’t; the moment they realise it was a rally of dudes clad in all black with their faces covered spouting bs; they should have issued move on orders. Yep, it violates the inciting racial hatred act. It’s worth pointing out that maybe it “slipped passed them” but my doubting that aside, incompetence is not a defence; as any cop will tell you.

The commissioner said he would review that decision and added he did not know the protest was taking place due to an internal "communication error", and that he had failed to brief the government.

ABC.

[–] MCHEVA4EVA@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It's an easy approve for the police, so many of their members where going to be there already. Might have even been marked down as a team building exercise.

[–] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 2 points 5 days ago

@okwithmydecay

Of course the NSW police approved a neo-nazi rally....
... they wouldn't want to see their colleagues waste their day off work!