this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

Pop Culture

63 readers
92 users here now

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

“It’s so bizarre here in the wealthiest country in the world, we have enough food, money, programs to end childhood hunger. And to use feeding kids as a weapon, going back & forth, doesn’t make any sense.”

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

so this is interesting. i knew some states governments had passed some emergency resolutions to do something about SNAP (i.e. supplementing funds) beyond the lawsuit, but i wasn't sure who had. the smattering of states includes who you might expect on either end, but there are some oddities in there for sure.

Source

if you can't read the tiny text,

  • red = do nothing
  • green = supplement with state funds
  • purple = working on a bill to use state funds

Additional Context:

Editor’s Note: As of October 31, 2025 at 3:57pm, a federal judge in Rhode Island has ordered the U.S. government to pay monthly SNAP benefits through November as soon as possible despite the shutdown. The ruling came just after another federal judge in Washington D.C. ordered the Trump administration to distribute contingency funds for SNAP. It remains unclear if and when funds will be distributed and the exact amounts SNAP recipients will receive. This is a developing story.

anyway, it's really classic politics for a state like texas to give ZERO fucks about poor people, but have their senators grandstand about how the democrats are playing politics with poor peoples' ability to get food. i listened to some texan GOP assbite on CSPAN yesterday for about 12 seconds, going on and on about how the minority opposition party is the real enemy of the poor.

like, no shit, if a state government has no contingency plan for at least short term supplementing as of right now, that is a choice.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Got to double check some of these, because Connecticut and Road Island have measures in place.

Not sure about the rest.

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

yeah, totally an evolving thing. that was the first article i saw talking about the national picture of state responses.

feels like the SNAP issue is something that will continue be used for political capital by everybody. i don't know how talking about what state governments are stepping up (and what state governments are hanging their people out to dry) isn't occurring right alongside the story of the federal cockup in terms of media framing.

certainly, a missed opportunity to add a little material context to the endless fingerpointing bullshit.

[–] rubber_chicken@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

I wanted to see how many people on SNAP have guns. The fucking AI thought I was talking about snapchat. Is snapchat still a thing? I replaced SNAP with "food stamps" in my query and got:

https://writeyourlaws.com/gun-bills/gun-stamps-just-like-food-stamps-only-for-guns/

marx-guns-blazing

[–] D61@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

The Dude does not abide...

[–] RION@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

SNAP Jeff Bridges be like who're you calling a program, program??