this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
115 points (95.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

13760 readers
1145 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 38 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

How can you do something daily once a week?

[–] HeavenlySpoon@ttrpg.network 34 points 3 weeks ago

They mean 4000 on a single day once per week, i.e. not just 4000 steps per week spread over multiple days.

[–] four@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago

You could read it as "meeting the daily quota just once a week has noticeable effects already".

But it is a weird way to word that headline

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Does 'daily' always mean every day or can it also mean per day?

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

It means every day.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It can mean both, apparently.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think the same (like its German counterpart), as the journalists of the Guardian are probably native speakers who should know, but the reactions of other lemmings seems to suggest that the other meaning is relatively uncommon.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like there could very easily be some correlation here. Those older people ABLE to walk 4,000 steps in a day are healthier than those UNABLE, right? So of course they’re likely to live longer.

(Not discounting the health value of activity at all.)

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

This study used a proportional hazards model. Confounders like lifestyle behaviors and comorbidities were controlled for. Unfortunately, the only factor relating to ability is a nebulous, self-reported, qualitative "health status", with possible answers of excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor. The researchers excluded the fair and poor groups, but the imprecise nature of that factor is an issue.

Here's the paper if you're curious:

https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2025/10/13/bjsports-2025-110311

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

You bet! I try to use my nerd skills for good.