this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

World In Progress

292 readers
1 users here now

WIP (World In Progress) intends to show all the positive progress going on in the world. It includes progress in technology, medicin, climate etc and not personal uplifting news.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, being capitalist dystopia, this won't make buildings safer. It will see them being made with less material.

[–] Poach@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Eh, that's just good engineering and resource usage (assuming it's not magically energy intensive). Anyone can build a bridge to not fail; it takes an engineer to make a bridge that barely doesn't fail.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But upping safety factors by 2 would still use less concrete than previous structures.
So could be an improvement to safety and cost.

Best case, the world uses less concrete (which I believe is a huge source of CO2)

[–] TehBamski@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Stronger and safer cement wouldn’t just be a boon for construction, but also the health of the planet, as the production of cement makes up roughly 8 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions."

[–] towerful@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I didn't read the article.

Having now read it, I was a bit concerned that they were going to be harvesting mother of pearl in some horrendous twist of "we can use less concrete! But we have to industrialise the harvesting of molluscs".

Thankfully it's the micro-pattern in polymers inspired by nature.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I had the same concern while reading until I realized the same thing about the structure. Glad we can safely replicate it instead of destroying another natural resource.