this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
143 points (98.6% liked)

General Memes & Private Chuckle

362 readers
581 users here now

Welcome to General Memes

Memes for the masses, chuckles for the chosen.

Rule 1: Be Civil, Not CruelWe’re here for laughs, not fights.

  • No harassment, dogpiling, or brigading
  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, sexism, etc.)
  • Keep it light — argue in the comments, not with insults

Rule 2: No Forbidden FormatsNot every image deserves immortality on the memmlefield. That means:

  • No spam or scams
  • No porn or sexually explicit content
  • No illegal content (seriously, don’t ruin the fun)
  • NSFW memes must be properly tagged

If you see a post that breaks the rules, report it so the mods can take care of it.

Otherwise consider this your call to duty. Get posting or laughing. Up to you

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Plant ID has its own drawbacks, now I'm actually aware of the major invasive species in my region and I see them everywhere now.

At least I have some cute wild carrots.

[–] porksnort@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Do not trust plant id apps to determine if anything is edible, for a start. The odds of a painful death are just too high. There is no substitute for actually learning plant id fundamentals.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Anyone who dies trusting this shit with their lives was murdered by silicon valley grifters. Man slaughtered by grifters?

[–] porksnort@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes the tech bros have some culpability, but everyone is responsible for what they put in their mouths. If you eat a strange plant without double checking, I mean, you did it to yourself.

Go ahead and bag on tech bros, I will join you. But I will also save a measure of my scorn for those who believe them to be trustworthy.

They thought they were checking.

They thought they were asking fucking computer god. Because they were told that, and nobody pushed back but a few fringe weirdos who were shouted down from all sides.

[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah absolutely. A few plant IDs I've tried have said very confidently that a plant is a specific thing, but then after reading descriptions and checking the scientific name it's very clearly not that. It does generally give a good place to start though. So maybe it's not black cohosh but it leads me to find out it's bugbane, for instance.

I have eaten some things I've foraged, but only things I've checked and double checked don't have any dangerous lookalikes. Thankfully it's hard to go wrong with a blackberry vine.

[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Hey AI, is this mushroom edible?"...

[–] Bring_Back_Buggy_Whips@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes! ~~only for shroom weevils - instantly fatal to humans~~

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

Other universally gud AI

  • text to speech
  • speech to text
  • language translation
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a different type of "AI", anyway. Most of what's fucking everyone over right now is LLMs, and LLMs are not doing plant identification. Though I suppose it's probably similar tech to facial recognition, and that one is definitely fucking people over, too.

[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago

Nah, I aksd ChadGBP what this plent is, and it said a plat name. Ergo…

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

While mushrooms aren't plants, I'm reminded of a couple who ate lethal mushrooms because their AI written book showed them a picture of those lethal mushrooms and said they were harmless (they thankfully survived, but they still got badly sick).

However I'm guessing by plant identification AI you mean less AI book and more active 'What's this plant?' type AI

[–] CatoPosting@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'd rather not have to pay the subscription, but PictureThis on iOS has been invaluable to my partner and I with identifying native plants to try and grow in our wildlife pond or to transplant into our yard for local pollinators. You can see a plant doing well in nature and snap a photo to learn what it likely is, if its native, and its common use case.

[–] fox@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Using reverse image search to ID a plant based on its leaves and flowers is pretty fun since they tend to be unique-ish and easy to tell apart. Would never try to ID mushrooms without expert advice, never mind eating them.

[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] holomorphic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

generating is just repeatedly classifying a high dimensional input with an unusally large set of classes.

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

the Ai that isn't bad is not getting shoved down my throat every day.

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you are comfortable trusting your life to a dice roll, I guess this meme is accurate.

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The use case here is to use AI to identify the plant, then cross reference it with an actual expert source to confirm.

Except its¹ not even useful for that.

¹not ai. And if it were there would be ethics/labor concerns.