745
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] a_baby_duck@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

The candidate who delivered Trump his first term, still doubling down on her "deplorables" strategy 7 years later.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

For the love of all that is, that has been, and that will be, get out and vote. Hillary opened her fucking mouth and the last time she did this shit Trump won. Every Democrat should now be rushing to the polls. The cycle is trying to repeat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] random65837@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I think it's amusing that Hillary thinks anybody gives half shit what she thinks at this point.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I think Godwin's Law now dictates that she has already lost the 2024 Presidential Election.

[-] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 months ago

I'm not sure how historically accurate that is. I mean, Hitler was appointed, not elected right? NSDAP members were elected, that is how a parliamentary system works.

Also the 1933 German elections were the result of a massive campaign of violence and intimidation against opposition parties and voters. I would hardly call that "duly elected".

Think of it as like: if we had 100x as many Proud Boys in the US, and they were posted at every polling location to decide who gets to vote or not...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

BACK TO THE FORESTS WITH YOU YOU FUCKING GHOUL

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

Considering her accuracy with him, this should make everyone who cares about the nation worried.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Was she accurate when she instructed Dem media partners to elevate Trump by name with the strategy being that he'd be too extreme for the general election?

Was she accurate when she was taking a preemptive victory lap in Texas on election night 2016?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Are people seriously voting for trump? There is no reason other than authoritarianism. It's kinda disturbing.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago

She totally doesn't look like a Disney villain in this picture /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

As she defends neo-librealist neo-facism at home and neo-facists in Israel...

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
745 points (90.4% liked)

politics

18992 readers
2925 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS