this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
1725 points (98.2% liked)

Comic Strips

19690 readers
1933 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I mean I wouldn't want it to not exist but if I just nearly died of chemo + cancer I'd be a little mad if they found an EASIER way to cure cancer...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 6 days ago

I am once again reminded: Humanity is fucking ugly. I'm starting to get nihilists.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah I don't think this covers the situation as much as it's a nice feel good story.

Imagine for a second you are relatively poor, you go to a state school or community college in order to afford it. You have loans, but they are small.

Now imagine you're upper middle class, you go to a private or out of state school and take loans out for a much much larger amount than the other person, with the expectation that you're getting more value for your money (let's ignore the labyrinth there for a second -- this is something many people believe and believing it, for some, makes it true).

Now, both loans are forgiven

Youve succeeded in making the rich richer, giving them both the higher valued education and all of their money back.

Or imagine you're that poor student but you're smart: you got a grant or scholarship making your loans nonexistent, but only if you go to the state school.

Once again, forgiving loans makes the already wealthy person significantly more wealthy and does nothing to benefit the poorer person.

Yes, of course, there's a wide range of reasons a person might go down either route, and I'm absolutely certain there are many millions of people who have gotten loans way above their wealth in order to go to a better school and jump out of poverty (or whatever). This comic ignores the nuance.

In the cancer analogy, this would be a poor person dying or otherwise experiencing terrible health problems because they couldn't get the care they needed, then when a cure is developed, only administering it to the people who could afford care to begin with (ie american health care)

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If this is a one-time event it's hardly the solution to the problem. Education should be free or close to free in general.

If that's the case, things suddenly look different. Even only if e.g. state schools are free.

In my country the tuition fee for a state university is around €30 per semester, and that doesn't even go to the university but to fund the student governing body (not sure what's the right translation for the term).

This means, that everyone can get a quality education even if they are poor. In fact, most people I went to university with funded their flat/student accomodation and food with a part-time job while going to university. No debts or financial assistance needed.

This doesn't cover private universities, but (a) the difference in quality and reputation isn't relevant and (b) free public universities means that private universities are also somewhat price capped if they want to stay competitive.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Of course, but that's never been a serious proposal in this country so I wasn't responding to it.

It's feasible to do this today in the US at some schools, but your parents have to really push you to get a lot of scholarships. It's not common.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

This is a great point. And yes, the system typically always rewards the rich far more than the poor.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Read all the comments🧵. Nobody mentioned that higher education was free in the 🇺🇲 until a racist made it costly for colors to attend.

Changed the link, since folks had difficulty trickling to the sources.🥁

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

made it costly for colors to attend

Are you sure that's the right link? The Wikipedia page talks about a law that mandates a permit for carrying firearms.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sheldan@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I don't feel like the comparison works, because we don't know a clear cure for cancer right now, but loan forgiveness is something we can technically do just fine (it's entirely human made after all)

I don't think you can feel unfairness about something not happening that, to our current knowledge, is not possible. You can feel a bit unfairness if something that might as well have helped you, won't be done for you... For no clear reason.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I admit I kinda feel this way about Ozempic after having to fight for years to finally get into better shape.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Thing is once they stop the pounds come back unless they change their behavior. If all they do is take the shots, they're likely signing up for an expensive long-term roller-coaster of weight loss and gain and emotions.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

Behavioural change is the crucial part of getting in shape, Ozempic is helpful for those who already did change their behaviour but still can't lose weight. Your fight is never wasted, you're significantly more healthy and fitter than those solely rely on Ozempic and never do the work, and that should be worth it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›