this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
34 points (97.2% liked)

Selfhosted

60409 readers
452 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was reading this guide on how to run a snowflake proxy, and I'm considering doing it.

https://snowflake.torproject.org/

I'm currently renting a small VPS for my self-hosted services, and I have some spare capacity. So I was wondering, are there any downsides that I might be overlooking?

My self-hosted services are on a URL with my real name. Could there be any privacy or legal implications for me? (I don't live under an authoritarian regime)

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] emhl@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Snowflakes are used as entry nodes, not as exit nodes. So if your Vps provider doesn't forbid running tor services you should not face any downsides

[–] TheBig2023Meltdown@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Who actually hosts exit nodes considering the risk of doing so?

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I did... Until the police knocked on my door. They said I was lucky because they decided to ask questions first, but they technically could have siezed every computer in my house without warning. I don't think you'd ever get convicted for something obviously done over tor, but having your stuff taken while they investigate is really inconvenient.

[–] mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

People who accept the fact that they will have to explain to the non-technical police that they are not the ones who did something bad and they're only the exit-node operators. And, of course, the three-letter agencies.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Not Sure Actually.

[–] mim@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Thanks! I'll check with my vps provider.

However, this proxy does not seem to be "within" the tor network itself, right? I'm just connecting someone to the first entry node on the system, correct?

Would I be transmitting unencrypted data? In other words, would an outsider be able to tell that I'm transmitting something illegal to a person accessing tor?

[–] emhl@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
  • The entry node doesn't know what data is being transmitted (or from where that data is) only who it's being transmitted to.
  • The middle nodes know nothing about the data and just know the previous and next hop.
  • The exit node knows what data is being accessed (if it's not being accessed via Https) but not who is accessing it

So in other words: no, you're not transmitting unencrypted data

[–] u202307011927@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

would an outsider be able to tell that I'm transmitting something illegal to a person accessing tor?

No, because if that was possible, law enforcement would set up quite some of those and catch some bad guys