this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
551 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

77340 readers
1706 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I'll take an 8k computer monitor though. In fact, send two. Kthnx.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And yet people want 4k screens on phones and 13in tablets...

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think most phone nerds understand that 4K on a phone is not necessary.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cynar@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago

Uncompressed 1080 is already approaching the eyes resolution limit, when viewing it in a living room environment. 4K is close to the monitor usage limit.

The reason that 4K seems better is often down to bandwidth and colour depth.

There's zero benefit to an 8K TV. An 8K monitor might be useful, but is still well into the diminishing returns curve.

There's still some ground to be made up with colours and frame rates, but resolution is effectively maxed out already.

[–] winni@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I found quite some 4k movies being more noisy than their 2k pendant. So whats the point?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 months ago

Makes sense:
No Media support.
And also on Monitors and Tvs i don't care if it's a. 1080p or 1440p of 4k give me 1080p

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

One thing, my current 4k TV/monitor does a pretty nice job upscaling 1080p. It, of course, doesn't look as good as native 4k, but it looks considerably better than 1080p not upscaled. So even without native 8k content, there is some value in being able to upscale 4k content to 8k.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

lol but you can have FHD the same size as that tv lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I want it, but at affordable prices

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MattTheProgrammer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I can't see ever owning an 8k display unless it's like 200 inches... The ones that are available now are too expensive to be a justifiable purchase and there's not really an abundance of content that takes advantage of the format.

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I mostly use my TV for gaming and watching old movies and anime.

The former task will be unviable at 8k and make my GPU cry, and the latter one makes 8k unnecessary.

I really don’t see the point in 8k displays right now.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›