this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
550 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

75602 readers
2235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

probably because i dont even care about 1080p tvs. they all look the same.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And of course the comment section with "16k around the coner, progress doesn't stop".

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

I can not tell the improvement since 1080P. Are these TVs letting us see into the future?

[–] harcesz@szmer.info 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, and 640kb RAM Ought to be Enough for Anyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I’d buy one if it came with every David Attenborough (or similar) nature documentary included. I don’t need 8k for games or movies or anything else but I’ll watch the shit out of whatever high budget nature documentaries are produced and put my nose against the screen to see the critter details.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I'll take one! Well, two really. One large one for TV/media viewing and one to replace my 43" 4k monitor. Quadrupling the resolution on that would be amazing.

The difference would be minimal on the media screen, TBH, but Ive seen them in person and can tell the difference. It's just not a big enough difference to warrant replacing what I have.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

Nobody will ever need an 8K TV, but 8K content would be nice on a (purely theoretical atm) pleasant to use head mounted display, one day

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

I can't even see the difference between 1080p and 4k.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh but what if it was in 3D!

Remember that time?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 5 points 3 weeks ago

I want 8K TVs, but only when there's abundant native 8K content to watch on it - otherwise there is no point.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›