this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
549 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

75368 readers
1441 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RustyShackleford@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I like how the article immediately tries placing the blame on the consumer. When in reality it’s the companies putting the cart before the horse and then being shocked when it doesn’t work out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

8K content is too storage hungry. My pirate ship is already bursting at the seams with some 4K but mostly 1080. I have 130TB of media, if it was in 8K I would need a water cooled server farm.

That's the REAL reason for lack of 8K interest, the pirates are not demanding it. Not until 100TB drives are available for a reasonable price.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Here I am still downloading the 720p versions of movies and not minding at all. If I want hyper resolution imagery I just go outside.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

How many homes have walls big enough for a screen big enough for 8k to matter

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

I hate the wording of the headline, because it makes it sound like the consumers' fault that the industry isn't delivering on something they promised. It's like marketing a fusion-powered sex robot that's missing the power core, and turning around and saying "nobody wants fusion-powered sex robots".

Side note, I'd like for people to stop insisting that 60fps looks "cheap", so that we can start getting good 60fps content. Heck, at this stage I'd be willing to compromise at 48fps if it gets more directors on board. We've got the camera sensor technology in 2025 for this to work in the same lighting that we used to need for 24fps, so that excuse has flown.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Kinokoloko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Bro I honest to God can't see the difference between 1080 and 4k, you could put them both next to me and I'd struggle to point out which is which. We don't need 8k. Enough is enough

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

I think 8k has a use, just not in consumer televisions for things like Netflix or gaming. 8k's real use is most likely in the medical field where high high high high detail is extremely important.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

How high detail if 300 dpi is already almost impossible to separate into dots for a human eye?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Who is out here filming at that resolution anyway? Cannot fathom the file sizes of anything made for these TVs

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] derry@midwest.social 12 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

4k ought to be enough for anybody

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Yeah, no shit. The only possible use is gaming, and even PC owners have been upscaling for some time now.

The only case where you might even notice a difference by going to 8K resolution is high end VR, but that's no reason to have 8K in a TV.

Even 4K is overkill for most movies. The HDR is the selling point there, which I'll admit looks nice.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's been observed that the porn industry is often one of the first adapters of new media tech before they become commonplace, but I'm not sure some things need to be shown in that high a resolution.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

i read the same comment about 1080p and 4k porn but here we are.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe people will be satisfied when they can put their TV under a microscope to determine the actor's sperm count...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I got a 4k monitor, and I could barely tell the difference with 1080p

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk 9 points 2 weeks ago

I still use a ten year old 1080p Sony TV, and I’ve yet to see a new <$1k TV with a nicer picture than what I have. Granted I don’t really consume any higher resolution content anyway 🤷‍♂️

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Even 4K the content is not yet easily available . I mean except from AppleTV plus that all content is 4K and it’s part of basic subscription, every other streaming charges much more for 4K content, most people don’t want to pay more every month for 4K

So 8K is just a distant reality that content makers are not really wanting to happen

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

How about uncompressed 4k before going to even more compression 8k. I have seen uncompressed 8k content on an 8k TV. I couldn't tell the difference between it and a good quality 4k picture, and I'm admittedly a quality snob. I can tell the difference in 1080 vs 4k pretty easily even on cheap tvs, it's just virtually non existent at 8k vs 4k in tv sizes up to 80 inch beyond viewing inches away from the screen.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›