this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
74 points (95.1% liked)

Socialism

600 readers
1 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic and constructive discussion from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

A certain knowledge of socialism is expected, if you are new to/interested in socialism, please visit c/Socialism101 before participating here. Socialism101 will gladly help you by answering questions, providing resources etc.

Memes go in c/Lefty Memes

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith discussion is enforced here.

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavour.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Xenial Xerus" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 23 points 1 week ago

And socialism isn't in the class interests of the oligarchy.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

Their owners won't allow them.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because democrats are not progressive, they're just left of republicans

[–] Boo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

US democrats for the most part are conservative/far right by EU political standards. Althoug we have seen a strong shift to the right in most EU countries political spectrum.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 13 points 1 week ago

Because democrats hate winners

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Republicans don't endorse Democrats.

I guess my question is, who is waiting for the endorsement of party officials who reliably don't give a shit what their constituents think?

[–] Boo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Vote blue no mattter who*

spoiler*when he was selected by the DNC elites and not by the people.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago

Probably a reprehensible business lackey

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Perhaps they want to have plausible deniability in the case where he a) doesn't get elected and b) gets elected and fucks up everything.

It doesn't seem to me like anyone is expecting him to get elected and succeed with his policies.

I see the downvotes but will agree that his path is risky and the establishment dems for the most part probably do not have the backbone to support him. His risk of failure is high because it is unusual and the outcome is not known. I think he is great, but establishment politicians are all bought and have no character, so...