I wonder what the neighbour kid would charge to cut that lawn.
Just Post
Just post something 💛
Likely the safest lawn they'd cut. The radiation levels are incredibly low, and it's going to be well maintained with no hidden hazards or issues that may pop up.
I mean nuclear energy is fine and all, but i'd argue that solar is still better.
Think about it:
Cyanobacteria and their photosynthesis (essentially generating energy out of sunlight) was the foundational breakthrough that allowed life to expand all across the planet and feed multi-cellular organisms, give rise to the modern variety in life that we see.
Solar panels are like photosynthesis (kinda), just on a more technical level. If nuclear energy would have been significantly cheaper in the last few decades, solar energy might not have been developed in the first place, because there would have been no perceived need for it, so we'd be stuck with nuclear.
But it is important that solar energy is available, and so it's a good thing that cheap nuclear power didn't prevent solar energy from happening. We should be thankful.
How much waste does solar produce for the same amount of energy to be delivered? A quick calculation from a very generous 30k kWh per solar panel lifetime results in almost 4 million solar panels for same amount of energy. How much of that waste would end up in a garbage heap? What is the environment cost to mine the materials for those solar panels? The environmental cost of the land needed to deploy them?
Saying "it's like photosynthesis" is the most useless, reductionist analysis you could possibly do.