I know you're only 50pg in but what's your impression so far?
I never read it either but I think I heard he was a Trotskyist.
Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.
c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting
Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.
Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).
When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.
Historical Disinformation will be removed
I know you're only 50pg in but what's your impression so far?
I never read it either but I think I heard he was a Trotskyist.
I'm now like 110 pages in (trying to power through as much as possible on a brief vacation) and really enjoying it. You get a sense of how a mix of both personal and political differences shaped the directions the struggle took, and how intermingled they were. And a lot of the questions and seemingly petty disputes they all grappled with still resonate.
Also because it's so long (though really it's 3 500ish page books) he really has time to patienntly fold in all the influences and doctrine already floating around and influencing the course of Trotsky's thought.
I don't know much about Deutscher really but so far the portrait seems pretty balanced - he obviously admires Trotsky doesn't seem interested in airbrushing away anyone's flaws. He also disputes or on occasion contradicts Trotsky's memoir.
IIRC he thought "Trotskyist" and "Stalinist" either were or eventually devolved into meaningless terms due to their vagueness and loaded nature, but obv I'm not there yet.